Skip to content
Twin Peaks Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Twin Peaks Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$165kHuman Services$150kCrime & Legal$145kFood & Nutrition$118kEnvironment$116kPhilanthropy$95kHousing & Shelter$75kYouth Development$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $196k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICES$50,000
SEED TO TABLE OREGON$20,000
CASCADES AIDS PROJECT$20,000
PORTLAND IMMIGRATION RIGHTS COALITION$20,000
SEEDING JUSTICE$15,000
SE ALASKA INDIGENOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSION$15,000
KIDS CENTER$15,000
CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH$10,500
VOICES ACROSS ALASKA FUND$10,000
SEEDING JUSTICE$10,000
END OF LIFE CHOICES OREGON$10,000
MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY$10,000
AROUND THE BEND FARMS$10,000
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY$10,000
LEGAL RIGHTS CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $5k → 14%THE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $5k → 13%REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 8%SAVING GRACE: $10k → 10%DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $10k → 10%IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICES: $50k → 12%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $10k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $10k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $10k → 10%REFUGE CARE COLLECTIVE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
OR
NV
CA
VA
NM
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Twin Peaks Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Twin Peaks Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$543k · 16 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
40

Total granted

$543k
$343k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+22%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • CO
    CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +26%
  • ST
    SEED TO TABLE OREGON
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -6%
  • DO
    Dream of Wild Healthgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +109%
  • IA
    IDAHO ASSOCIATION OF TRIO PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
2
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
3
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Oregon Justice Resource Center

Providing legal advocacy to underserved communities

Civil Rights
6
Ashland Works

Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…

Community Improvement
7
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
8
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
9
Mother Nation

Mother Nation is a Native American 501(c)(3) nonprofit that offers culturally informed healing services, advocacy, mentorship and homeless prevention in Washington State. We support Native and Indigenous women during times of transition…

Human Services
10
Sage Indigenous Law Center

Sage Indigenous Law Center's mission is to provide culturally grounded civil legal aid that protects the rights of Native American parents, children, and communities, while advancing justice and addressing systemic inequities.

Crime & Legal
11
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc

See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
32/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH: $40,500 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCHPORTLAND RESCUE MISSION: $30,000 · OtherPORTLAND RESCUE MISSIONSE ALASKA INDIGENOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSION: $30,000 · OtherSE ALASKA INDIGENOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSIONJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 · OtherJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INCPORTLAND IMMIGRATION RIGHTS COALITION: $20,000 · OtherSPRUCE ROOT INC: $25,000 · OtherSPRUCE ROOT INCCRAG LAW CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCRAG LAW CENTERNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $25,000 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER+28 more: $232,500 · Other+28 moreIMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRATION COUN…REFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST: $30,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE CARE COL…MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $20,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINSTAR FAM…DESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDESCHUTES CHILDR…SAVING GRACE: $10,000 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACENEIGHBORIMPACT: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACTFamily Access Network Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesFamily Access Ne…No One Left Behind: $10,000 · Human ServicesNo One Left Behi…+2 more: $10,000 · Human Services+2 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $120,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…CASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $20,000 · HealthCASCADE AIDS PR…211INFO: $10,000 · Health211INFOKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $45,000 · Crime & LegalKIDS INTERV…THE NEXT DOOR INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DO…LEGAL RIGHTS CENTER: $20,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL RIGHT…Red Lodge Transition Services: $10,000 · Crime & LegalRed Lodge T…GUARDIAN GROUP: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSEEDING JUSTICE: $35,000 · PhilanthropySEEDING J…THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGO…EQUITABLE GIVING CIRCLE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyEQUITABLE…Maine Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMaine Com…SEED TO TABLE OREGON: $37,500 · Food & NutritionAround The Bend Farms Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionBLACK OREGON LAND TRUST: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCULTIVATE INITIATIVES: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CIC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBETHLEHEM INN: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$458,000Human Services$160,000Health$150,000Crime & Legal$110,000Philanthropy$95,000Food & Nutrition$62,500Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON LANDWATCH: $40,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSEED TO TABLE OREGON: $37,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSEEDING JUSTICE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE CARE COLLECTIVE NORTHWEST: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCRAG LAW CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPRUCE ROOT INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULTIVATE INITIATIVES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL RIGHTS CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAround The Bend Farms Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetEQUITABLE GIVING CIRCLE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDream of Wild Health: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaine Community Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESCHUTES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRed Lodge Transition Services: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAVING GRACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALASKA INDIGINOUS TRANSBOUNDARY COMMISSI: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEND OF LIFE CHOICES - OREGON: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Access Network Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget211INFO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALEM FOR REFUGEES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetON THE INSIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetGUARDIAN GROUP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPIE RANCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK OREGON LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetINDIGENOUS WOMEN RISING INDIGEOUS WOMEN RISING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetElevated Access Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationThe Roundhouse Founda…Meyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Ford Family Found…Onpoint Community Cre…First Interstate Banc…United Way of Deschut…St Charles Health Sys…The Anjulicia Foundat…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR49.3× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twin Peaks Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twin Peaks Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • 211INFO: 60% of income from government
  • Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery: 60% of income from government
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Saving Grace: 48% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch: 45% of income from government
  • The Next Door Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Salem for Refugees: 35% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team: 28% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Immigration Counseling Service Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
  • Red Lodge Transition Services: 12% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
  • Cultivate Initiatives: 0% of income from government
  • Seeding Justice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twin Peaks’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home