· Public charity
Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd
To prioritize and address the health and wellness needs of the residents and the community of twin falls county, idaho.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of TWIN FALLS COUNTY HEALTH INITIATIVES TRUSTLTD’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $358k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES CORP | $30,000 |
| VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE | $20,000 |
| VALLEY HOUSING COALITION | $20,000 |
| MUSTARD SEED | $20,000 |
| BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE | $20,000 |
| SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS | $20,000 |
| TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| TWIN FALLS COUNTY ADULT MISDEMEANOR | $20,000 |
| MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC | $20,000 |
| THE WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC | $20,000 |
| RECOVERY IN MOTION | $19,920 |
| WEST END SENIOR CENTER | $16,395 |
| EVERYBODY'S HOUSE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VAVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $184k · revenue +72%
- IVINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +2%
- MSMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- MVMagic Valley Youth Services INCone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -48%
- BPBUHL PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2021 · $20k
- MVMAGIC VALLEY PEDIATRIC CANCER COALIone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.
Interfaith sanctuary is a collaboration of people of faith and people of goodwill who provide shelter and services to the homeless. we provide overnight shelter for men, women, and children, and supportive services to promote greater…
Provide food to needy members of the community.
St vincent de paul provides housing, utilities, food and medical asistance to the poor of the community
SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…
Valley Mission currently operates a Food Pantry. New services offered in the new facility will inlcude an 18-bed emergency shelter, commercial kitchen/dining area, office space, medical clinic, 16-bed transformational living program (6…
Serving senior citizens in area
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Housing Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blanket Blessings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds EVERYBODY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds Magic Valley Youth Services INC ↗
- Who funds WEST END SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds E Street Community Center ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN IDAHO INC DBA Girls on the Run Treasure Valley ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · First Federal Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Racing for Charity Inc · United Way of South Central Idaho Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.