Skip to content
Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd at a glance

· Public charity

Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd

To prioritize and address the health and wellness needs of the residents and the community of twin falls county, idaho.

$369k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$612kHealth$564kEducation$338kCommunity Improvement$200kCrime & Legal$170kHousing & Shelter$130kFood & Nutrition$118kRecreation & Sports$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $358k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES CORP$30,000
THE WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC$20,000
SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC$20,000
INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS$20,000
VALLEY HOUSING COALITION$20,000
TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
TWIN FALLS COUNTY ADULT MISDEMEANOR$20,000
MUSTARD SEED$20,000
MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC$20,000
BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE$20,000
VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE$20,000
RECOVERY IN MOTION$19,920
WEST END SENIOR CENTER$16,395
EVERYBODY'S HOUSE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WEST END SENIOR CITIZEN'S INC: $6k → 11%WEST END SENIOR CITIZEN'S INC: $6k → 11%WEST END SENIOR CITIZEN'S INC: $5k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%EVERYBODY'S HOUSE: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $20k → 11%MUSTARD SEED: $15k → 11%EVERYBODY'S HOUSE: $15k → 11%E STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $14k → 11%BLANKET BLESSINGS: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 27 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
12

Total granted

$2.1M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+38%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VA
    VOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $184k · revenue +53%
  • IV
    INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +2%
  • MS
    MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • BP
    BUHL PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • LI
    LIVING INDEPENDENT NETWORK CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • MV
    Magic Valley Youth Services INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
3
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
4
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
5
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
6
Interfaith Sanctuary Housing Services Inc

Interfaith sanctuary is a collaboration of people of faith and people of goodwill who provide shelter and services to the homeless. we provide overnight shelter for men, women, and children, and supportive services to promote greater…

Housing & Shelter
7
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
8
Eagle Community Foodbank Inc

Provide food to needy members of the community.

Food & Nutrition
9
Idaho Falls Conference of the Society of St Vincent De Paul Inc

St vincent de paul provides housing, utilities, food and medical asistance to the poor of the community

Community Improvement
10
Sisters Cold Weather Shelter

SCWS' mission is to unite the Sisters area community in a shared commitment to supporting our most vulnerable neighbors. We strive to ensure that every individual has access to life's essentials - from food and shelter to vital resources…

Housing & Shelter
11
Valley Mission Inc

Valley Mission currently operates a Food Pantry. New services offered in the new facility will inlcude an 18-bed emergency shelter, commercial kitchen/dining area, office space, medical clinic, 16-bed transformational living program (6…

Human Services
12
Stillwater Senior Citizens Center

Serving senior citizens in area

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Housing Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blanket Blessings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC: $171,447 · OtherTHE WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINICCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION: $102,867 · OtherCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATIONTWIN FALLS COUNTY CLERK: $100,000 · OtherTWIN FALLS COUNTY CLERKHANSEN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $67,469 · OtherHANSEN SCHOOL DISTRICTMURTAUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60,000 · OtherMURTAUGH SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC: $55,000 · OtherTWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT-CANYON R: $36,980 · OtherMAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC: $40,000 · Other+20 more: $349,570 · Other+20 moreVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $184,398 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE …MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC: $155,000 · Human ServicesMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INCTWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesTWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS F…BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC: $86,570 · Human ServicesBECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INCEVERYBODY HOUSE: $35,000 · Human ServicesEVERYBODY HOUSE+3 more: $39,406 · Human Services+3 moreSAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $153,543 · HealthSAGE WOMEN'S C…Family Health Services Corporation: $149,805 · HealthFamily Health …INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC: $180,000 · Community ImprovementFIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC: $90,383 · Crime & LegalIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $90,000 · Food & NutritionTWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,043,333Human Services$600,374Health$303,348Community Improvement$180,000Crime & Legal$90,383Food & Nutrition$90,000Housing & Shelter$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $184,398 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC: $180,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC: $155,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetSAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $153,543 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation: $149,805 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION: $102,867 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetFIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC: $90,383 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC: $86,570 over 6y, 32% of budgetVALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetMAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetEVERYBODY HOUSE: $35,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST END SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER: $17,018 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetE Street Community Center: $14,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN IDAHO INC DBA Girls on the Run Treasure Valley: $12,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $8,952 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIFTH JUDICAL DISTRICT CASA PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYBODY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Magic Valley Youth Services INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST END SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds E Street Community Center ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN IDAHO INC DBA Girls on the Run Treasure Valley ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health Syst…First Federal Foundat…Idaho Community Found…St Luke's Magic Valle…Janice Seagraves Fami…Magic Valley Festival…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Racing for Charity IncUnited Way of South C…Laura Moore Cunningha…Idaho Foodbank Wareho…
St Luke's Health System LtdID38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · First Federal Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Racing for Charity Inc · United Way of South Central Idaho Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home