Skip to content
Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$4.2MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$521kYouth Development$118kFood & Nutrition$18kInternational$7kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $553k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$1,250,000
COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$1,005,000
JAARS INC$510,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC$504,000
WINGS OF EAGLES RANCH$200,000
CVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM$115,296
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS CNTY$110,000
CABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER$70,000
KANNAPOLIS BIBLE TEACHING ASSOCIATION$57,741
THE SALVATION ARMY$32,130
CABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES$6,000
ROWAN -CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC$5,000
COLTRANE LIFE CENTER INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $6k → 16%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $4k → 16%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $2k → 7%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $500 → 15%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $2k → 7%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
MO
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 35 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
4

Total granted

$5.8M
$808k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JAARS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $530k · revenue +58%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +29%
  • CH
    CABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • GU
    GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $800k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
3
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
4
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
5
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
6
Chinese Christian Fellowship Intl

It is ccf's objective to establish training centers in communities all over the world teaching biblical truth to produce in all who are called to be leaders and participants lives in christ's fullness: 1. study god's word with life…

Religion
7
Christian Community School

As a support to evangelical christian families, the mission of christian community school is to provide an academically excellent, biblically integrated education which promotes christ-like character, preparing students to serve god and…

Education
8
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
9
Northwest Cabarrus High School Bible Teaching Association

Funding for bible teacher at northwest cabarrus high school

—
10
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
11
CrossTraining Ministry of Pilot Mountain
Religion
12
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazareth Children's Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is South Rowan Public Schools Bible Te. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $3,000,000 · OtherCOOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRYBAPTISH CHILDREN'S HOME OF NC: $605,000 · OtherBAPTISH CHILDREN'S HOME OF NCWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $508,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCCVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM: $390,253 · OtherCVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM+19 more: $422,335 · Other+19 moreCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $1,010,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNI…GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY+3 more: $25,400 · EducationJAARS INC: $530,000 · Community ImprovementCABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $230,000 · HealthWINGS OF EAGLES RANCH: $200,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthCommunity Free Clinic Inc: $20,000 · HealthCABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $19,550 · HealthCHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesBEN MYNATT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $9,400 · Human ServicesNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1,500 · Human ServicesIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 · ReligionLaszlo Mission League Inc: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionCENTRAL CABARRUS BIBLE TEACHING ASS: $5,000 · Religion1 Can Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCABARRUS MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,925,588Education$1,835,400Community Improvement$530,000Health$499,550Human Services$39,400Religion$22,000Food & Nutrition$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $1,010,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $800,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJAARS INC: $530,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $230,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetWINGS OF EAGLES RANCH: $200,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Free Clinic Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $19,550 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH ROWAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIBLE TE: $12,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES INC: $11,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCONCORD BIBLE TEACHING ASSOCIATION: $11,400 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetColtrane LIFE Center Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget1 Can Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEN MYNATT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $9,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetCABARRUS MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLaszlo Mission League Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Cabarrus County: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCabarrus County Education Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKANNAPOLIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cannon Foundation…Foundation for the Ca…Duke Energy FoundationWcnc Cannon Charitabl…Mariam & Robert Hayes…United Way of Greater…Speedway Children's C…Charles a Cannon Trus…The Leon Levine Found…The Winston-Salem Fou…Enterprise Holdings F…The US Charitable Gif…
The Cannon Foundation IncNC33.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Wcnc Cannon Charitable Trust · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Speedway Children's Charities · Charles a Cannon Trust No 1 · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home