Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Religion$4.2MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$521kYouth Development$118kFood & Nutrition$18kInternational$7kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $553k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$1,250,000
COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$1,005,000
JAARS INC$510,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC$504,000
WINGS OF EAGLES RANCH$200,000
CVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM$115,296
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS CNTY$110,000
CABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER$70,000
KANNAPOLIS BIBLE TEACHING ASSOCIATION$57,741
THE SALVATION ARMY$32,130
CABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES$6,000
SOUTH ROWAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIBLE$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $6k → 16%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $4k → 16%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%CHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES: $2k → 16%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $2k → 7%ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $500 → 15%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC: $2k → 7%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IN
MO
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.8M · 35 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
4

Total granted

$5.8M
$808k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JAARS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $530k · revenue +81%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +29%
  • CH
    CABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • GU
    GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $800k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

3
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
4
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
5
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
6
Chinese Christian Fellowship Intl

It is ccf's objective to establish training centers in communities all over the world teaching biblical truth to produce in all who are called to be leaders and participants lives in christ's fullness: 1. study god's word with life…

Religion
7
Christian Community School

As a support to evangelical christian families, the mission of christian community school is to provide an academically excellent, biblically integrated education which promotes christ-like character, preparing students to serve god and…

Education
8
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
9
Northwest Cabarrus High School Bible Teaching Association

Funding for bible teacher at northwest cabarrus high school

10
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
11
CrossTraining Ministry of Pilot Mountain
Religion
12
Sole Ministries

None

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazareth Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is South Rowan Public Schools Bible Te. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Equine Therapy ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Construc…Christian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr12%43%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%19%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr14%36%20–35yr12%10%35–55yr12%36%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY — $3,000,000 · OtherCOOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRYBAPTISH CHILDREN'S HOME OF NC — $605,000 · OtherBAPTISH CHILDREN'S HOME OF NCWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC — $508,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCCVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM — $390,253 · OtherCVAN WOMEN'S PROGRAM+19 more — $422,335 · Other+19 moreCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $1,010,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNI…GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY — $800,000 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY+3 more — $25,400 · EducationJAARS INC — $530,000 · Community ImprovementCABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $230,000 · HealthWINGS OF EAGLES RANCH — $200,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 · HealthCommunity Free Clinic Inc — $20,000 · HealthCABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $19,550 · HealthCHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES INC — $11,500 · Human ServicesROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesBEN MYNATT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION — $9,400 · Human ServicesNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES — $1,500 · Human ServicesIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $7,000 · ReligionLaszlo Mission League Inc — $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 · ReligionCENTRAL CABARRUS BIBLE TEACHING ASS — $5,000 · Religion1 Can Inc — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCABARRUS MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$4,925,588Education$1,835,400Community Improvement$530,000Health$499,550Human Services$39,400Religion$22,000Food & Nutrition$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $1,010,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY — $800,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJAARS INC — $530,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCABARRUS WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $230,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetWINGS OF EAGLES RANCH — $200,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Free Clinic Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCABARRUS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $19,550 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH ROWAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BIBLE TE — $12,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCHRIST CARES 4 U MINISTRIES INC — $11,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCONCORD BIBLE TEACHING ASSOCIATION — $11,400 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetColtrane LIFE Center Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget1 Can Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEN MYNATT CHILDRENS FOUNDATION — $9,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetCABARRUS MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLaszlo Mission League Inc — $5,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Cabarrus County — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCabarrus County Education Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKANNAPOLIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cannon Foundation IncNC33.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Wcnc Cannon Charitable Trust · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Speedway Children's Charities · Charles a Cannon Trust No 1 · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tucker Heart Soul Mind and Strength funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph