Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trebek Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Trebek Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to World Vision Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 22 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Trebek Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $233k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

21
’17
28
’18
14
’19
24
’20
24
’21
21
’22
11
’23
8
’24
22
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.9MInternational$1.8MEnvironment$1.6MHealth$575kHousing & Shelter$460kFood & Nutrition$454kPhilanthropy$433kReligion$308kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHEWS SOUP KITCHEN INC$75,000
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$50,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$25,000
CHILDRENS BURN FOUNDATION$20,000
GREATER HARLEM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FUND$20,000
HARLEM GROWN INC$10,000
ELIMU-USA$10,000
AID STILL REQUIRED$10,000
K Chassner$6,500
S Smith$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($7.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($1.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $5k → 14%YMCA OF THE EAST VALLEY: $5k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $100k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $20k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $10k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $10k → 14%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $5k → 14%NOHO HOME ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
NY
MA
SD
IA
CA
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($1.6M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$1.6M · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Trebek Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Trebek Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 38 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
26

Total granted

$6.6M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+22%

Still filing today

79%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHealthInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    4× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +40%
  • HT
    HOPE THE MISSION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $350k · revenue +460%
  • PI
    PARENTS IN PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2017–2021 · $264k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA
    one grant, 2018 · $800k · revenue -73%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +125%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Associated Universities Inc

Associated universities inc (aui) collaborates with the scientific community and research sponsors to plan, build, and operate cutting-edge facilities. we cultivate excellence, deliver value, enhance education, and engage the public.

Science & Tech
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is Autism Movement Therapy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/66
Grantees still filing
39/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ROYAL CANADIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY: $1,650,000 · OtherTHE ROYAL CANADIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETYFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA: $800,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWARED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $535,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLST MATTHEWS SOUP KITCHEN INC: $359,000 · OtherST MATTHEWS SOUP KITCHEN INCCHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE NORTH HOLLYWOOD: $307,500 · OtherCHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE NORTH HOLLYWOODCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $195,000 · Other+41 more: $1,014,000 · Other+41 moreWORLD VISION INC: $2,330,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $216,800 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $155,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS+3 more: $157,500 · International+3 moreFordham University: $1,100,000 · EducationFordham Universi…PARENTS IN PARTNERSHIP: $263,500 · EducationPARENTS IN PARTN…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $150,000 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAP…THE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $55,000 · Education+1 more: $7,000 · EducationPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $200,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 · HealthTHE ED ASNER FAMILY CENTER: $65,000 · HealthTHE LIFE GROUP LA INC: $20,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthNEW VENTURE FUND: $400,000 · EnvironmentHARLEM GROWN INC: $50,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentHOPE THE MISSION: $350,000 · Human ServicesNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $45,000 · Human Services+3 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesGREATER HARLEM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FUND INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $75,000 · PhilanthropyBOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,860,500International$2,859,300Education$1,630,500Health$490,000Environment$455,000Human Services$425,000Philanthropy$263,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $2,330,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University: $1,100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $400,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $350,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPARENTS IN PARTNERSHIP: $263,500 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $216,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNING RIGHTS LAW CENTER: $125,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAid Still Required: $80,000 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetThe Rona Barrett Foundation: $75,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetRETHINK FOOD NYC INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetART CREATES US INC: $65,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ED ASNER FAMILY CENTER: $65,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetTHE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELIMU-USA: $47,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetTHE CAMPBELL CENTER: $45,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $45,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHE THALIANS: $40,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMusk Ox Development Corporation: $30,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIFE GROUP LA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetAutism Movement Therapy Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetJAZZMOBILE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetICAN ASSOCIATES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetA WOMAN'S NATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKYHOOK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNOHO HOME ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSHADOWLAND FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetYMCA of the East Valley: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS IN PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING RIGHTS LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds Aid Still Required ↗
  • Who funds The Rona Barrett Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RETHINK FOOD NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds ART CREATES US INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ED ASNER FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MR HOLLAND'S OPUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHENS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM GROWN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIMU-USA ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPBELL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE THALIANS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds Musk Ox Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trebek Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trebek Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trebek Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph