· Private foundation
Trane Technologies Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $139k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $999k
- $250k+10 grants · $6.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE | $1,130,000 |
| Emergency Assistance Foundation Inc | $1,038,109 |
| Foundation for the Carolinas | $933,334 |
| American Online Giving Foundation | $668,514 |
| Charlotte Symphony | $500,000 |
| ONETEN COALITION INC | $500,000 |
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA | $493,602 |
| Project Scientist | $410,000 |
| Reading is Fundamental | $299,837 |
| DIGIBRIDGE | $290,000 |
| Cal Ripken Sr Foundation | $150,000 |
| Scholarship America | $127,770 |
| OPPORTUNITY AT WORK | $125,000 |
| Redeem Detroit | $100,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUND | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 30% of Trane Technologies Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $894k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSProject Scientist Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +28%
- SMSCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA3× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +58%
- RIREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +87%
Funded once
- CFCAROLINA FARM TRUST INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $400k · revenue +25%
- ULURBAN LEAGUE OF CTR'L CAROLINAS CHAone grant, 2023 · $150k
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INCone grant, 2022 · $117k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.
Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Kentucky Inc and the most unlike its peers is Science Museum of Minnesota. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Project Scientist Inc ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
- Who funds Digi-Bridge ↗
- Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA FARM TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds REDEEM PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITYWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MeckEd ↗
- Who funds LaAmistad Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIC ENERGY INNOVATIONS ↗
- Who funds FOODCHAIN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ally Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Presbyterian Hospital · Charities Aid Foundation America · Pwc Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · C D Spangler Foundation Inc · Merancas Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trane Technologies Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Northwest Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Trane Technologies Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Trane Technologies Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.