Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tortimaki Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$243k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$655kEnvironment$227kInternational$175kHealth$148kFood & Nutrition$140kRecreation & Sports$61kHousing & Shelter$45kArts & Culture$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $170k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIGHT TO PLAY$25,000
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$20,000
SAVE THE SOUND INC$20,000
SAVE THE SOUND INC$15,000
TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
CITY HARVEST INC$10,000
LAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC$10,000
BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC$10,000
BACKCOUNTRY MEDICAL GUIDES$10,000
IRIS FUND$10,000
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$10,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI$10,000
STOWE LAND TRUST$7,500
FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND A$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $5k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 37 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

76%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $138k · revenue +13%
  • ST
    SAVE THE SOUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $128k · revenue +40%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    6× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +17%
  • JP
    JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -43%
  • VW
    Village Water Filters Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +289%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Iris Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Trustees of Tufts College: $120,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $95,000 · EducationTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INCTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $57,500 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICABACKCOUNTRY MEDICAL GUIDES: $55,000 · EducationBACKCOUNTRY MEDICAL GUIDESGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $50,000 · EducationGREENWICH ACADEMY INCST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYWilliams College: $45,000 · EducationWilliams CollegeFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $45,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVER…THE COLORADO COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGE+3 more: $22,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE - FLETCHER SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE - …TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $48,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEG…ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI: $40,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELAT…PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $31,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE …ST AUGUSTINE CHURCH: $22,500 · OtherST AUGUSTINE CHURCHFRIENDS OF THIRTEEN INC: $22,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THIRTEEN INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $19,500 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE: $45,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE+16 more: $114,025 · Other+16 moreSAVE THE SOUND: $127,500 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDSTOWE LAND TRUST: $60,000 · EnvironmentSTOWE LAND TRU…PROTECT OUR WINTERS: $15,000 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WI…SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $137,500 · Recreation & SportsSPORTS HU…CITY HARVEST INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionLAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionLarchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $24,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $22,500 · PhilanthropyThe Iris Fund Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropySave The Children Federation Inc: $77,500 · InternationalWater Is Life Inc: $5,000 · International
Education$574,500Other$402,025Environment$202,500Recreation & Sports$137,500Food & Nutrition$100,000Philanthropy$92,000International$82,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC: $137,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $127,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $95,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $77,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTOWE LAND TRUST: $60,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $57,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY MEDICAL GUIDES: $55,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $40,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLarchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $24,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THIRTEEN INC: $22,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $19,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION: $12,525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOWE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $10,500 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetJTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Iris Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLarchmont Friends Of The Family: $9,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARS NOVA THEATER I INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVillage Water Filters Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetPINE MANOR COLLEGE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMELIN THEATRE: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDARTMOUTH DRAGON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPORTS HUMANITARIAN GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STOWE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BACKCOUNTRY MEDICAL GUIDES ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
  • Who funds LAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THIRTEEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STOWE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The Iris Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Larchmont Friends Of The Family ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds My Sisters Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARS NOVA THEATER I INC ↗
  • Who funds Village Water Filters Inc ↗
  • Who funds Water Is Life Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tortimaki Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tortimaki Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Stowe Land Trust: 10% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tortimaki Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tortimaki Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tortimaki’s filings →

More from the funding graph