Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tom and Lois Longest Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$840k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$218k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$866kHuman Services$634kReligion$597kHousing & Shelter$105kHealth$86kCommunity Improvement$73kFood & Nutrition$55kYouth Development$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $618k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$218,000
CHRIST ACADEMY$150,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS$95,000
HOLY FAMIILY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC$95,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WICHIT$60,000
NEW HOPE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF DECAT$45,000
TEXOMA MOTHER AND UNBORN BABY CARE$30,000
KMOC FM$30,000
WISE CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CEN$26,828
PHASED IN$25,000
INHERITANCE ADOPTIONS$20,000
YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS$15,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES SERVI$10,000
TRAIL LIFE TX0254$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITES FORT WORTH NORTHW$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $301k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOY'S TOWN: $150 → 12%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $257 → 20%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%SHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH: $40k → 15%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $40k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES SERVI: $10k → 10%SHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH: $40k → 15%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $40k → 10%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $35k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES SERVI: $10k → 10%SHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH: $16k → 15%CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO: $25k → 10%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $25k → 11%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $5k → 11%YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS: $15k → 16%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $75 → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $25 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Tom and Lois Longest Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Tom and Lois Longest Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 53 repeat orgs$470k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
54

Total granted

$2.0M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+34%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationHealthPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $184k · revenue +410% · 25% of their budget
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $184k · revenue +41%
  • TG
    TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH
    3× · 2018–2020 · $150k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $89k
  • HC
    HILLCREST CHILDREN'S HOME AOG
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ARCHER CITY
    one grant, 2024 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
Faith in Public Life Inc

Faith in public life's mission is to advance the moral imperative for a just, inclusive and equitable country that allows each of us to live into our full humanity. we do this by building power and cultures of belongings among diverse…

Religion
5
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

6
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
9
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
10
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

11
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
12
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Policy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%34%35–55yr13%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%23%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr13%21%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 23% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/71
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/61
Grantees still filing
49/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $324,512 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $89,262 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHALPHA CHRISTIAN CHILDREN HOME — $80,000 · OtherALPHA CHRISTIAN CHILDREN HOMEWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC — $72,925 · OtherWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INCKMOC FM — $60,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF WICHIT — $60,000 · OtherHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $47,500 · OtherHILLCREST CHILDREN'S HOME AOG — $45,000 · OtherNEW HOPE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF DECAT — $45,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ARCHER CITY — $40,000 · Other+71 more — $297,267 · Other+71 moreCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS — $184,262 · EducationCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WIC…HOLY FAMILY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC — $184,262 · EducationHOLY FAMILY CLASSICAL ACA…CHRIST ACADEMY — $170,000 · EducationCHRIST ACADEMYBIBLE BAPTIST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $2,235 · EducationTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $150,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS…CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S…SHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH — $95,700 · Human ServicesSHILOH CHRISTIAN CHI…SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ACRES CHILD…PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $20,000 · Human Services+5 more — $15,607 · Human ServicesEAGLE RANCH INC — $115,000 · Health+5 more — $3,115 · HealthPhased In — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterCONVOY OF HOPE — $55,000 · International+8 more — $1,350 · InternationalSTARFISH FOUNDATION — $35,650 · ReligionAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · Religion+2 more — $750 · Religion
Other$1,161,466Education$565,759Human Services$451,307Health$118,115Housing & Shelter$105,000International$56,350Religion$40,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS — $184,262 over 2y, 25% of budgetHOLY FAMILY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC — $184,262 over 2y, 22% of budgetCHRIST ACADEMY — $170,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $150,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetEAGLE RANCH INC — $115,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC — $105,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPhased In — $105,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH — $95,700 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKMOC FM — $60,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $47,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSTARFISH FOUNDATION — $35,650 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBIBLE BAPTIST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $25,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTVIEW BOYS HOME INC — $17,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Institute — $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChild Evangelism Fellowship of West Texas — $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION INC — $2,145 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,035 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ORPHANS HANDS INC — $905 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER — $225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $175 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmericans United for Life Inc — $170 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United Foundation — $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC — $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY CLASSICAL ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds CHRIST ACADEMY
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH
  • Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME OF OHIO INC
  • Who funds Phased In
  • Who funds SHILOH CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S RANCH
  • Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC
  • Who funds KMOC FM
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds STARFISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TEXOMA MOTHER & UNBORN BABY CARE INC PREGNANCY HELP CENTER
  • Who funds BIBLE BAPTIST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds INHERITANCE ADOPTIONS
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES
  • Who funds WESTVIEW BOYS HOME INC
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita Falls Area Community FoundationTX23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation · Rose & K V Mathew Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Vandevere Charitable Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tom and Lois Longest Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph