Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$199kHousing & Shelter$127kHuman Services$116kInternational$106kHealth$105kPhilanthropy$72kYouth Development$72kAnimals$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$2,520
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,203
Individual grant recipient$12,601
THE SALVATION ARMY$12,601
EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION$12,601
VISITING NURSING ASSOC OF SW$7,561
SW IN EASTER SEAL SOC REHAB CTR$7,561
YOUNG LIFE$5,041
UNITED WAY OF SW INDIANA$5,041
WORLD VISION INC$5,041
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION$5,041
CHRISTIAN HOPE ASSOCIATION$5,041
PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION$5,041
AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS$2,520
OLD COURTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF$2,520
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$2,520
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN NAT'L RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
PA
CT
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$961k · 30 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$961k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
0%

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +105%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +18%
  • CH
    Christian Hope Association
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • DO
    DOWNTOWN OPTIMISTS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • ES
    EASTER SEAL SW INDIANA
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
4
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
Evansville Arc Inc

To empower individuals with disabilities to build relationships, gain independence and achieve their full potential.

Human Services
7
Evansville Museum of Arts History & Science

The museum's mission is to enrich lives through preservation, exploration, enlightenment and amazement.

Arts & Culture
8
Girl Scout Commonwealth Council of Virginia Inc

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. the girl scout leadership expereience is a one-of-a-kind leadership development program for girls with proven results. it is based on…

Youth Development
9
Vermont Electric Cooperative Inc

Vermont electric cooperative is a member owned not-for-profit whose mission is to provide safe, affordable, and reliable energy services to its members.

—
10
VisionFund International

VisionFund International (VFI) was established for the purpose of supporting World Vision International (WVI) by coordinating and providing funding to World Vision - affiliated microfinance institutions (MFIs) located in developing…

Philanthropy
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mental Health Association in Vanderburg County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $180,920 · OtherEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $90,459 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $90,459 · OtherEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INCIndividual grant recipient: $75,373 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVISITING NURSING ASSOC OF S W: $54,277 · OtherVISITING NURSING ASSOC OF S WUNITED WAY OF SW INDIANA: $36,184 · OtherChristian Hope Association: $36,184 · OtherPEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION: $36,184 · Other+19 more: $234,599 · Other+19 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $36,184 · InternationalSave The Ch…WORLD VISION INC: $36,184 · InternationalWORLD VISIO…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $18,092 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,678 · InternationalUNITED STAT…EVANSVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $18,092 · AnimalsVANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,076 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,092 · Human ServicesUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $18,092 · EducationEVANSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $18,092 · Recreation & SportsDEACONESS HOSPITAL INC: $18,091 · HealthUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $7,016 · Public Benefit
Other$834,639International$106,138Animals$29,168Human Services$18,092Education$18,092Recreation & Sports$18,092Health$18,091Public Benefit$7,016

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $90,459 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $36,184 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $36,184 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Hope Association: $36,184 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $18,092 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,092 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $18,092 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $18,092 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $18,092 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEVANSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $18,092 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetDEACONESS HOSPITAL INC: $18,091 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPatchwork Central Inc: $18,091 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,678 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156: $15,074 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetVANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,076 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $7,016 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Hope Association ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156 ↗
  • Who funds VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN VANDERBURG COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Koch Foundation IncIN22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Adam E Naab Foundation · Henry F Koch Residual Trust Co Fifth Third · The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc · Kinney Family Foundation · Holiday Management Foundation · Gerling Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C’s filings →

More from the funding graph