· Private foundation
The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVANSVILLE WARTIME MUSEUM INC | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE | $1,500 |
| PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE | $1,100 |
| VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,050 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA MASTER GARDENER ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| YOUTH FIRST | $800 |
| WARRICK COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $800 |
| IT TAKES A VILLAGE | $800 |
| REITZ HOME MUSEUM | $800 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $750 |
| PATCHWORK CENTRAL | $700 |
| EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION | $700 |
| TURNING POINT DONKEY RESCUE | $600 |
| KEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PVPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $4k · revenue +114%
- VCVANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +2%
- PCPatchwork Central Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- TTTALON TRUSTone grant, 2023 · $200
- FOFRIENDS OF AUDUBON INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $100 · revenue +116%
- FOFRIENDS OF WILLARD LIBRARY INCone grant, 2024 · $100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization supports activities at the mesker park zoo & botanic gardens through leadership, education, fund development & volunteer services for the benefit of the people, plants, & animals it serves.
Animal shelter
The van wert county humane society is committed to building a community of responsible pet owners and ending animal cruelty; to offering a safe haven for animals in need; and to attempt through all reasonable avenues to return animals to…
Auburn valley humane society enriches the lives of companion animals and people through animal sheltering, programs, services and community engagement
The evanston animal shelter and adoption center gives companion animals the best chance at the life they deserve through rehabilitation, foster care, adoption and community support that keeps pets with the people who love them.
To lead the community in the humane treatment of animals.
llinois Valley Animal Rescue's mission is to rescue, provide care and comfort for abused, neglected and homeless animals in the Illinois Valley Area through a care center, foster homes and veterinarian sources. To promote responsible pet…
The organization's purpose is to promote the welfare and humane treatment of animals.
The organization provides a safe shelter for animals until they can be adopted into a lifelong home. the organization supports local law enforcement departments in animal abuse and neglect cases, works with animal rescue groups and…
The museum's mission is to enrich lives through preservation, exploration, enlightenment and amazement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Keep Evansville Beautiful Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santa Clothes Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EWM INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA MASTER GARDENER ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE P-47 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Peaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
- Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds GENTLE GIANTS RESCUE AND ADOPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KEEP EVANSVILLE BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Santa Clothes Club Inc ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AUDUBON INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE JUNIOR FOOTBALL LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE HERB SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Kinney Family Foundation · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co · Baird Foundation Inc · West Side Nut Club Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Eugene and Pauline Hall Little Flock Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Albon Foundation Trust · Edward Love Foundation · Holiday Management Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.