How much did COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ALLIANCE INC grant in FY2024?

Human Services$4.3MEducation$2.0MHealth$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.5MArts & Culture$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.1MYouth Development$879kReligion$737kHousing & Shelter$644kOther$8.8M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

technologyhealthscholarshipseducationalchildrenyouthscholarship

2020

non-profitchildrenchristcorporationeducationevansvilleliving

2021

further exempt

2022

further exempt

2023

further exempt

2024

further exempt

2025

further exempt

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 211 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k77 grants · $562k
$10k–50k106 grants · $2.1M
$50k–250k25 grants · $2.4M
$250k+3 grants · $981k

$12,217

Median grant

States reached

$149M

Total assets

Largest grants

POSEY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION$392,150
DAVIESS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$337,277
SOUTHWEST INDIANA POWERHOUSE$251,503
MEMORIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$225,000
HOLLY'S HOUSE INC$158,543
USI FOUNDATION$153,562
YWCA OF EVANSVILLE$130,452
EASTERSEALS REHABILITATION CENTER$125,318
MARIAH HILL FOUNDATION$118,138
DAVIESS COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION$113,623
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$110,089
THE ARC SOUTHWEST INDIANA$106,120
INDIANA MILITARY MUSEUM$105,700
YMCA OF VINCENNES$104,970
SYCAMORE LAND TRUST$103,711

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$19M · 229 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

229 repeat relationships — 153 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

229

128

Total granted

$19M

$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+33%

Still filing today

63%

48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $867k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DC
Daviess County Family YMCA
7× · 2018–2024 · $923k · revenue +70% · 31% of their budget
YF
Youth First Inc
7× · 2018–2024 · $506k · revenue +83%
PC
POSEY COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
3× · 2021–2024 · $437k · revenue +1540% · 61% of their budget

Funded once

PC
Perry County Business and Industrial Development Corporation
one grant, 2018 · $415k · revenue -100%
Fidelity Charitable Gift Fundgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $380k · revenue +47%
WW
WORLD WIDE HISPANIC OUTREACHgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $119k · revenue +33% · 36% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

West Central Indiana Economic

Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning

Community Improvement

Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

—

The Open Door of Indiana

Human services

—

The Jackson County United Way Inc

To assess needs, secure resources and strategically invest resources to create lasting change in jackson county, in.

Philanthropy

Indiana Sheriffs' Association Inc

Provide training and education to sheriffs and departmental personnel and distribute educational materials to the public.

Crime & Legal

University of Indianapolis

The mission of the University of Indianapolis is to prepare its graduates for effective membership in the societies in which they live and serve, and for excellence and leadership in their lives.

Education

Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services

Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc

Food & Nutrition

Goodwill of Central & Southern Indiana

[see schedule o]goodwill of central and southern indiana offers a variety of employment, education and health services geared toward helping individuals and families become economically self-sufficient.

Employment

Workforce Inc

To strengthen central indiana communities by helping local employers build a better workforce.

Employment

Indiana Regional Medical Center

To serve the healthcare needs of every life we touch with compassion, respect, and dignity.

Health

Dismas House of Indiana Inc

Provides transitional housing and other services for persons released from prison.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Evansville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%6/402

the rest of the field

166/2,079

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

240 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

230/240

Grantees still filing

170/240

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$11,060,487Human Services$4,293,751Education$1,996,889Health$1,519,855Community Improvement$1,493,749Arts & Culture$1,313,442Philanthropy$1,096,644

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Welborn Baptist Foundation IncIN97.5× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Southwestern Indiana Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · West Side Nut Club Inc · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ALLIANCE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OAK GROVE CARETAKERS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 815403888 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OAK GROVE CARETAKERS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 94% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Foundation Alliance Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Foundation Alliance Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ALLIANCE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

240 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Foundation Alliance Inc?

More from the funding graph

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ALLIANCE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

240 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Community Foundation Alliance Inc?

More from the funding graph