· Private foundation
Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $25,203 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $12,601 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,601 |
| EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION | $12,601 |
| SW IN EASTER SEAL SOC REHAB CTR | $7,561 |
| VISITING NURSING ASSOC OF SW | $7,561 |
| UNITED WAY OF SW INDIANA | $5,041 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $5,041 |
| CHRISTIAN HOPE ASSOCIATION | $5,041 |
| WORLD VISION INC | $5,041 |
| PEARL S BUCK FOUNDATION | $5,041 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION | $5,041 |
| EVANSVILLE MUSEUM OF ARTS | $2,520 |
| UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND | $2,520 |
| US FUND FOR UNICEF | $2,520 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EREVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +105%
Save The Children Federation Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +18%- CHChristian Hope Association7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- DODOWNTOWN OPTIMISTS CLUBone grant, 2019 · $15k
- ESEASTER SEAL SW INDIANAone grant, 2021 · $8k
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Children's services
To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
To empower individuals with disabilities to build relationships, gain independence and achieve their full potential.
The museum's mission is to enrich lives through preservation, exploration, enlightenment and amazement.
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. the girl scout leadership expereience is a one-of-a-kind leadership development program for girls with proven results. it is based on…
Vermont electric cooperative is a member owned not-for-profit whose mission is to provide safe, affordable, and reliable energy services to its members.
VisionFund International (VFI) was established for the purpose of supporting World Vision International (WVI) by coordinating and providing funding to World Vision - affiliated microfinance institutions (MFIs) located in developing…
Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mental Health Association in Vanderburg County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Hope Association ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
- Who funds DEACONESS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO TRACE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #156 ↗
- Who funds VANDERBURGH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN VANDERBURG COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · West Side Nut Club Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Adam E Naab Foundation · Henry F Koch Residual Trust Co Fifth Third · The Aline and Edgar Igleheart Foundation Inc · Kinney Family Foundation · Holiday Management Foundation · Gerling Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tom & Evelyn Ingle Charitable Trust C funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.