· Private foundation
Holiday Management Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $380k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $484k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DREAM CENTER | $100,000 |
| YMCA | $89,100 |
| TRI-STATE FOOD BANK | $85,000 |
| YOUTH FIRST | $60,000 |
| ARK CHILD CRISIS CENTER | $50,000 |
| YWCA | $50,000 |
| VANDERBURGH COUNTY CASA | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY ONE INC | $40,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $40,000 |
| ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER | $30,000 |
| AURORA INC | $30,000 |
| EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPT FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LAMPION CENTER | $25,000 |
| HOLLY'S HOUSE | $25,000 |
| EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $473k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $147k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTRI-STATE FOOD BANK6× · 2019–2024 · $480k · revenue +100%
- YFYOUTH FIRST5× · 2019–2024 · $400k · revenue +83%
- AFALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC6× · 2019–2024 · $215k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2020 · $100k
- YTYWCA - TRANSITIONAL HOUSING RECOVERY PROGRAMone grant, 2019 · $80k
- IAIN Agriculture & Technology Schoolone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide emergency shelter which is life saving and transitional housing for those seeking to end homelessness. ESNKY is open to those who are homeless, stranded or without utilities. Seeking to provide a safe, secure environment…
Sheltered home environment
To provide counseling and assisstance with housing needs for clients located in the evansville, in area under guidelines established by the housing and urban development provisions.
Susie's Place promotes the prevention, justice and healing of child victims of abuse and violence while maintaining the comfort and safety of the child as the first priority.
Choices of manistee county, inc. provides emergency shelter, crisis intervention, counseling, advocacy, and education to survivors of domestic violence in manistee county, empowering survivors to achieve safety and self-determination.
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
Residential Faith-based drug and alcohol recovery.
Promote business growth and activities in evansville, indiana.
To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
To work towards the prevention and elimination of domestic and dating violence.
Provide resources for low income clients.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Evansville Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
- Who funds Vanderburgh County CASA Inc ↗
- Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARK CRISIS PREVENTION NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE CHRISTIAN LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ONE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FATHER BRADLEY SHELTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION D/B/A EVANSVILLE POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPORT NET AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Holly's House Inc ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE CHOICES MATERNITY AND YOUTH HOME INC ↗
- Who funds AURORA INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE MENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Evansville Emergency Food Pantry Consortium inc ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds United Caring Shelters Inc ↗
- Who funds Jacobs Village Inc ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LAMPION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Patchwork Central Inc ↗
- Who funds ECHO HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CANCER PATHWAYS MIDWEST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · West Side Nut Club Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Holiday Management Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Holiday Management Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Holiday Management Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.