Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tjootjim Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Housing & Shelter$40kFood & Nutrition$34kAnimals$25kCrime & Legal$21kReligion$15kRecreation & Sports$15kEducation$14kScience & Tech$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$806k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND HOUSING$40,000
KU ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$10,000
TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS$10,000
HAWAII FOODBANK$7,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%APOPO: $2k → 14%APOPO: $2k → 14%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
MO
AZ
KS
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 95% of Tjootjim Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 21% of the giving stays in HI; read by stated purpose it is 3% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Tjootjim Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

6%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18k · 3 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +402% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
39

Total granted

$18k
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+402%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HAWAII FOODBANK INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +28%
  • AU
    APOPO US INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +402%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS NEEDIEST CASES
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • RG
    RAIN GARDENS TO THE RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
3
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

11
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
12
Wikimedia Foundation Inc

The mission of the wikimedia foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally. (see schedule…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Food Search Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Orleans Sponsoring Committee -Together New Orleans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Public University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and AdoptionUnited Way FederationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Ymca Community CentersCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Native Hawaiian Community D…Government Accountability R…Land Conservation Organizat…Food Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%65%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LOUIS NEEDIEST CASES — $20,000 · OtherST LOUIS NEEDIEST CASESRAIN GARDENS TO THE RESCUE — $19,565 · OtherRAIN GARDENS TO THE RESCUEIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $10,000 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation IncFRAGMENTS OF HOPE — $10,000 · OtherFRAGMENTS OF HOPESECOND HELPINGS - INDIANAPOLIS — $10,000 · OtherSECOND HELPINGS - INDIANAPOLIS+27 more — $54,333 · Other+27 moreBEYOND HOUSING INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterBEYOND HOUSING I…HAWAII FOODBANK INC — $13,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBA…OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FOO…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOO…Forest Park Forever Inc — $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EnvironmentLAHUI FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EnvironmentThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $10,000 · EducationDESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO INC — $1,050 · EducationNEW ORLEANS SPONSORING COMMITTEE -TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 · Community ImprovementSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $500 · Community ImprovementACTBLUE CHARITIES INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$163,898Housing & Shelter$40,000Food & Nutrition$33,000Environment$13,000Education$11,050Community Improvement$10,500Philanthropy$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS SPONSORING COMMITTEE -TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Louis Bicycle Works Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPOPO US INC — $4,050 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARASITES WITHOUT BORDERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDO IT FOR THE LOVE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOKONUT KOALITION — $1,075 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESTINATION IMAGINATION COLORADO INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAST PRISONER PROJECT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreenet Project Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tjootjim Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph