Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas F & Cm Hastings Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$92kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$20kInternational$17kHealth$13kRecreation & Sports$12kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
WHEN LOVE FIND LOVE INC$2,000
JESSAMINE OLD TIME RADIO$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL$500
CAMP HORSIN AROUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHRISTAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CTR: $500 → 16%LOAVES & FISHES INTL: $500 → 9%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHRISTAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CTR: $500 → 16%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHRISTAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CTR: $500 → 16%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES: $500 → 6%HOMEMADE HOPE: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 32 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
22

Total granted

$193k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+4%

Still filing today

44%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +98%
  • CH
    CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +98%
  • NS
    Natalie's Sisters Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +535%

Funded once

  • 4L
    4-H LIVESTOCK SALE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • JC
    JESSAMINE CO OLD TIME RADIO TROUPE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • A
    A21
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holt International Children's Services Inc

Holt international is a christian organization guided by compassion and the highest ethical standards. we find and support permanent, loving families for children who are orphaned, abandoned, or at serious risk of family separation;…

Human Services
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
7
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
8
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
Gift of Life International Inc

To further the cause of world peace and understanding by facilitating free medical services, primarily to children suffering from heart defects and other similar or allied illnesses regardless of race, gender, creed, or national origin,…

Health
11
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
12
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Confrontation Point Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $76,575 · OtherST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCAMP HORSIN AROUND: $11,809 · OtherCAMP HORSIN AROUNDHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY+30 more: $44,800 · Other+30 moreCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $7,000 · HealthCHRYSALIS…Natalie's Sisters Inc: $6,500 · HealthNatalie's…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,500 · HealthST JUDE C…+1 more: $100 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 · InternationalMedical Bridges Inc: $2,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalCIRCLE OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $610 · InternationalCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $600 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalCHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesChristian Community Service Center Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesLOAVES AND FISHES INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 · Human ServicesHomemade Hope for Homeless Children: $500 · Human ServicesHouston Public Media Foundation: $4,000 · Arts & CultureHouston Symphony Society: $750 · Arts & CultureLANE OF ROSES INC: $3,500 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsGIVING TREE GLOBAL INC: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$155,184Health$18,100International$16,210Human Services$6,000Arts & Culture$4,750Religion$3,600Animals$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNatalie's Sisters Inc: $6,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Public Media Foundation: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLANE OF ROSES INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Bridges Inc: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING TREE GLOBAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHouston Symphony Society: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC: $610 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHomemade Hope for Homeless Children: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTAPLAST INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConfrontation Point Ministries Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENDYL AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Natalie's Sisters Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Public Media Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LANE OF ROSES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Medical Bridges Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Christian Community Service Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds GIVING TREE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Symphony Society ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas F & Cm Hastings Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas F & Cm Hastings Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas F & Cm Hastings’ filings →

    More from the funding graph