Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Patricia Pelger Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$842kYouth Development$593kHuman Services$332kEducation$203kHousing & Shelter$106kPhilanthropy$42kHealth$28kArts & Culture$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC$75,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH$46,100
MIDTOWN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$32,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$32,000
PEORIA PROMISE FOUNDATION$28,521
ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH$27,600
ST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH$12,000
DANDELION HOUSE$12,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PEORIA COUNCIL$10,000
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
DIOCESE OF PEORIA$9,000
CATERPILLAR FOUNDATION$8,000
THE OHRA CENTER$7,000
ASHLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $18k → 8%UNBOUND: $900 → 16%DANDELION HOUSE: $12k → 12%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 8%UNBOUND: $900 → 16%DANDELION HOUSE: $10k → 12%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 8%UNBOUND: $625 → 16%DANDELION HOUSE: $10k → 12%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%DANDELION HOUSE: $5k → 12%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%DANDELION HOUSE: $5k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $14k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $13k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $13k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $13k → 8%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $13k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
OR
SD
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 30 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
16

Total granted

$2.2M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+79%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PEORIA PROMISE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +25%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PEORIA COUNCIL
    3× · 2021–2025 · $71k · revenue +155%
  • SC
    SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $64k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN VIANEY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CD
    COLEGIO DE STA RITA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • AS
    APOSTOLIC SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Shares of Illinois

Community shares of illinois represents a diverse group of charitites with a common mission, to make our world a better place. whether your passion is women's issues, protecting children, helping animals, promoting health care or curbing…

—
2
Illinois Partners for Human Service

Illinois Partners for Human Service's primary activities are (1) strengthening human services in communities throughout Illinois by building a unified human services sector; (2) working with leaders, the public, and others engaged in the…

Human Services
3
United Way of Illinois

Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois

Philanthropy
4
Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
7
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
8
Friends of the Children - Chicago

Friends of the children - chicago has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services
9
The Partnership for College Completion

The Partnership for College Completion (PCC) champions policies, practices, and systems that increase college completion and eliminate degree completion disparities for low-income, first generation, and students of color in Illinois…

Education
10
People Matter

To uplift, unearth and untether people in different chicago communities. we achieve this through direct service, political education and issue advocay work. the vision is to expand ot the rest of chicago, nation and globe.

Public Benefit
11
Children's Advocates for Change

Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…

Human Services
12
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Justfaith Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caterpillar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC: $367,398 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INCST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $359,036 · OtherST JUDE CATHOLIC CHURCHST VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH: $323,300 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL PARISHMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $236,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS+35 more: $220,505 · Other+35 moreMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $236,000 · EducationMidtown-Metro Achieve…PEORIA PROMISE FOUNDATION: $181,345 · EducationPEORIA PROMISE FOUNDA…+2 more: $502 · EducationSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $64,000 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $63,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …DANDELION HOUSE: $42,000 · Human ServicesDANDELION…Unbound: $6,025 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PEORIA COUNCIL: $70,500 · ReligionDREAM CENTER OF PEORIA NFP: $7,100 · Religion+2 more: $1,062 · ReligionBUILDING HOPE IN KIDS - UGANDA: $14,000 · InternationalILLINOIS VALLEY PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION: $8,500 · Arts & CulturePRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,325 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,506,239Education$417,847Human Services$175,525Religion$78,662International$14,000Arts & Culture$8,500Crime & Legal$2,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $236,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPEORIA PROMISE FOUNDATION: $181,345 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PEORIA COUNCIL: $70,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $64,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $63,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDANDELION HOUSE: $42,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN KIDS - UGANDA: $14,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCaterpillar Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM CENTER OF PEORIA NFP: $7,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUnbound: $6,025 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $2,325 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTFAITH MINISTRIES INC: $1,012 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS CANCERCARE FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Waters: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Midtown-Metro Achievement Centers ↗
  • Who funds PEORIA PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PEORIA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds DANDELION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING HOPE IN KIDS - UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Caterpillar Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CENTER OF PEORIA NFP ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTFAITH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN12.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Chubb Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Patricia Pelger Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Patricia Pelger Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Patricia Pelger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph