Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The ZelnickBelzberg Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
68
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$3.2MHousing & Shelter$1.8MRecreation & Sports$1.1MArts & Culture$1.0MHealth$1.0MHuman Services$786kPhilanthropy$262kPublic Benefit$217kOther$0
02FY2025 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $196k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wesleyan University$500,000
Caron Foundation$210,000
Packer Collegiate Institute$166,666
Third Way Institute$150,000
Neighbors Link$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
Northern Westchester Hospital$100,000
Blue Path Service Dogs$75,000
Porter's Call$66,667
Project Heal$65,000
Extended Family Solutions$61,480
The Breakthrough Fund$55,000
United Israel Appeal$50,000
American Museum of the Moving Image$50,000
Rideback Rise$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Tia's Hope: $5k → 14%Extended Family Solutions: $61k → 9%Flatwater Foundation: $1k → 10%Susan B Anthony Project: $1k → 9%Anchor House: $500 → 11%Tia's Hope: $5k → 14%Extended Family Solutions: $16k → 9%Flatwater Foundation: $500 → 10%Susan B Anthony Project: $1k → 9%Tia's Hope: $500 → 14%Extended Family Solutions: $1k → 9%Flatwater Foundation: $500 → 10%Commonpoint Queens: $1k → 13%Flatwater Foundation: $500 → 10%Commonpoint Queens: $1k → 13%Flatwater Foundation: $500 → 10%Commonpoint Queens: $500 → 13%Neighbors Link: $160k → 9%Neighbors Link: $150k → 9%Neighbors Link: $100k → 9%Neighbors Link: $100k → 9%Neighbors Link: $100k → 9%Neighbors Link: $2k → 9%Matan: $5k → 17%Matan: $4k → 17%Matan: $2k → 17%Matan: $2k → 17%The Chick Mission: $2k → 17%Selfhelp Community Services: $1k → 17%Matan: $118 → 17%Snack & Friends: $10k → 17%Snack & Friends: $3k → 17%Snack & Friends: $1k → 17%Covenant House: $1000k → 17%Covenant House: $496k → 17%Covenant House: $206k → 17%Covenant House: $50k → 17%Covenant House: $16k → 17%Childrens Aid Society: $2k → 17%Hidden Water: $4k → 17%Hidden Water: $1k → 17%Hidden Water: $750 → 17%Hidden Water: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 96 repeat orgs$941k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

96 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
87

Total granted

$10M
$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+26%

Still filing today

70%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +34%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +40%
  • RS
    RIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $788k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • CR
    COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -81%
  • UJ
    United Jewish Federation
    one grant, 2023 · $36k
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +161%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan and the most unlike its peers is Understood for All Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Local History MuseumsCommunity Food PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsAddiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%40%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/153
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,607

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 211 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
147/149
Grantees still filing
106/149
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Park Avenue Armory — $995,696 · OtherPark Avenue ArmoryCaron Foundation — $635,000 · OtherCaron FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $280,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHunter College — $240,000 · OtherHunter CollegeEndeavour — $139,511 · OtherNYU FACES — $135,000 · OtherTHIRD WAY INSTITUTE — $150,000 · Other+105 more — $1,459,472 · Other+105 moreCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,767,827 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSENEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $611,500 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORPPORTERS CALL — $350,001 · Human ServicesPORTERS CALL+14 more — $142,515 · Human ServicesWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $1,284,063 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYRIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC — $787,837 · EducationRIVERVIEW SCHOOL INCPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $286,666 · EducationPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUT…Williams College — $107,462 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Education+18 more — $91,129 · EducationNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $315,000 · HealthPROJECT HEAL HELP TO EAT ACCEPT & LIVE — $228,500 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $112,000 · HealthNEXT FOR AUTISM INC — $85,790 · Health+15 more — $48,000 · HealthRIDEBACK RISE INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM — $125,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARTSCONNECTION INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $33,334 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $28,600 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $27,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HASTY PUDDING - INSTITUTE OF 1770 INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $45,800 · Arts & CultureCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $8,100 · Philanthropy+4 more — $9,044 · PhilanthropyANGUILLA INITIATIVE — $211,434 · Public Benefit
Other$4,034,679Human Services$2,871,843Education$2,662,157Health$789,290Arts & Culture$584,734Philanthropy$227,144Public Benefit$211,434

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $1,767,827 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $1,284,063 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC — $787,837 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP — $611,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPORTERS CALL — $350,001 over 6y, 21% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $315,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $286,666 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HEAL HELP TO EAT ACCEPT & LIVE — $228,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetANGUILLA INITIATIVE — $211,434 over 2y, 49% of budgetCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIDEBACK RISE INC — $150,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetLOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM — $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $112,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College — $107,462 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC — $90,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC — $85,790 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE EXTENDED FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC — $78,480 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $77,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOB PATH INC — $64,708 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBreakthrough Fund Inc — $55,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetAMERICAN MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC — $46,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION INC — $33,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $33,334 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD RIDING LANES ASSOCIATION — $28,725 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $28,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc — $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HASTY PUDDING - INSTITUTE OF 1770 INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TO RECOVERY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $14,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $13,512 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $13,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMATAN INC — $12,372 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBLACK THEATRE UNITED INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNDERSTOOD FOR ALL INC — $11,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC — $11,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
  • Who funds PORTERS CALL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEAL HELP TO EAT ACCEPT & LIVE ↗
  • Who funds ANGUILLA INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US ↗
  • Who funds RIDEBACK RISE INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD WAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LOWER EAST SIDE TENEMENT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT FOR AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EXTENDED FAMILY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOB PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds Breakthrough Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE ↗
  • Who funds EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSCONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The Hyde and Watson F…The Warburg Pincus Fo…Bauer Family Foundati…Yvonne & Leslie Polla…Select Equity Group F…The New York Communit…The Peek Family Found…Peckham Family Founda…The Ayco Charitable F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Jewish Communal FundNY33.9× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · Bauer Family Foundation · Yvonne & Leslie Pollack Family Foundation Inc · Select Equity Group Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Peek Family Foundation Inc · Peckham Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The ZelnickBelzberg Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Anchor House Inc — 45% of income from government
  • The Finca Vigia Foundation Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Williams College — 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Riverview School Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The ZelnickBelzberg Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The ZelnickBelzberg Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 211 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines