· Private foundation
The Yung Hope Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| CCUC | $40,000 |
| PUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| PUI TAK CENTER | $10,365 |
| URBAN VOICE | $5,000 |
| RESOURCE GLOBAL | $5,000 |
| CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADE | $2,000 |
| WORLD VENTURE | $2,000 |
| NYU | $1,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION | $400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| PS40 PTA | $155 |
| ST JUDE | $100 |
| CHINESE AMERICA SERVICE LEAGUE | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTPUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL6× · 2019–2025 · $134k · revenue +115%
- PTPUI TAK CENTER7× · 2019–2025 · $93k · revenue +39%
- RGRESOURCE GLOBAL7× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +162%
Funded once
- WMWENDELL MEMORIAL CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $1k
- CFCOALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCACgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $300 · revenue +88%
- MMMARANTHA MISSION BIBLE COLLEGEone grant, 2021 · $300
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To coordinate chinese churches in midwest america for the mission of cross cultural and cross generational spreading gospel of jesus christ. to promote unity within christian fellowship through conferences and trainings.
ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally
To share Gospel with Chinese intellectuals. The goals of the Association are 1. to network and discipline Chinese Christian scholars in North America for their moral and academic excellence, 2. to reach the unreached Chinese academic world…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Spreading the gospel to chinese people around the world. preaching the gospel to the chinese people; sending mission workers into various countries; helping churches in the u.s. and abroad with a vision for world evangelism.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Serve Chinese churches worldwide through publishing and media. Also help Chinese churches to grow in Christ, to witness for Him in all parts of the world and to expand the Kingdom of God.
Access is a small, faith-based nonprofit organiztion based in boston's chinatown. we empower low-income chinese immigrant families with a holistic approach, caring for each individual's entire well-being.
Religious broadcasting services to involve christians in professional and media fields to join force in the production of gospel programs for radio and
An evangelical interdenominational missionary society dedicated to reaching chinese for christ.
The purpose of RTCP is to enable Chinese Christians returning to China to experience successful reentry and integration into a local church. We help them through training, networking, and connecting them with churches in China. The…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pui Tak Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PUI TAK CENTER ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Yung Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.