Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wolf Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$158kHuman Services$156kAnimals$129kHealth$105kEnvironment$80kPhilanthropy$66kArts & Culture$56kFood & Nutrition$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEADS$27,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$18,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$15,000
HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC$12,000
HOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$10,000
AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC$10,000
BENNETT AUTOMOTIVE FOUNDATION$7,000
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$5,000
SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER$5,000
AMERICAN CLOCK AND WATCH MUSEUM INC$5,000
HELENE FULD COLLEGE OF NURSING$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
SHRINERS CHILDRENS BOSTON$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $769 → 16%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 11%BOSTON HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS: $125 → 16%HOUSEHOLD GOODS INC: $3k → 8%NEADS: $28k → 11%NEADS: $27k → 11%NEADS: $25k → 11%NEADS: $23k → 11%CAMP KESEM: $3k → 14%NEADS: $23k → 11%NEADS: $20k → 11%NEADS: $14k → 11%NEADS: $14k → 11%DIGNITY MATTERS INC: $2k → 8%THE WAYLAND COMMUNITY FUND: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
CO
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$936k · 28 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
28

Total granted

$936k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

64%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NEADS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $173k · revenue +53%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +47%
  • AO
    AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SW
    SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MA
    MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
6
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
7
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
8
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
9
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
10
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Native American Rights Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
28/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $62,572 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INCMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $45,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALTHE JOEY FUND: $40,000 · OtherTHE JOEY FUNDURBAN BEE KEEPING LAB: $21,000 · OtherANGELL ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · OtherVETERANS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $16,395 · OtherAMERICAN WATCHMAKERSCLOCKMAKERS INSTITUTE: $15,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,268 · Other+29 more: $130,879 · Other+29 moreNEADS INC: $172,500 · Human ServicesNEADS INC+6 more: $10,966 · Human Services+6 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $171,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERS…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $90,000 · AnimalsAQUARIUM OF THE…LINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION: $35,116 · AnimalsLINDA BLAIR WOR…MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL F…THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $7,500 · AnimalsHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $34,500 · Youth DevelopmentSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC: $13,268 · Youth DevelopmentBENNETT AUTOMOTIVE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · Science & TechHELENE FULD COLLEGE OF NURSING: $12,500 · HealthHOLLYWOOD SUNSET FREE CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · Health
Other$422,114Human Services$183,466Education$173,500Animals$142,616Youth Development$74,768Science & Tech$40,000Health$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEADS INC: $172,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $171,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $62,572 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION: $35,116 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $34,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $21,268 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $16,395 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN WATCHMAKERSCLOCKMAKERS INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC: $13,268 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $12,660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELENE FULD COLLEGE OF NURSING: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLYWOOD SUNSET FREE CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $5,176 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospitality Homes Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSEHOLD GOODS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPOONFULS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $2,072 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIEL FIELD TRIAL ASSN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Project Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDMF Internationl Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY BOATING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC: $894 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUDRAIN AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEADS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds LINDA BLAIR WORLD HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN WATCHMAKERSCLOCKMAKERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds HELENE FULD COLLEGE OF NURSING ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLLYWOOD SUNSET FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BENNETT AUTOMOTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CLOCK AND WATCH MUSEUMINC ↗
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hospitality Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSEHOLD GOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOONFULS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Conrad N Hilton FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wolf Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wolf Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Veterans Legal Services Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Wolf Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Wolf Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wolf Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph