Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wildwood Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$395k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.9MAnimals$2.2MEnvironment$1.5MHealth$1.3MEducation$229kReligion$190kPhilanthropy$80kYouth Development$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $335k
  • $250k+2 grants · $645k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$395,000
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$250,000
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$220,000
CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY$65,000
BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE$50,000
DELAWARE WILD LANDS$25,000
KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION$20,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$20,000
SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$20,000
THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE$20,000
VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES$20,000
SPRING ISLAND TRUST FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN RIVERS$10,000
CITY TRACK$10,000
UNICEF USA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION: $170k → 10%SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $70k → 8%BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE: $50k → 6%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $270k → 16%GREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $25k → 9%TROUT UNLIMITED: $60k → 7%KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION: $45k → 10%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $270k → 16%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $170k → 9%TROUT UNLIMITED: $25k → 7%KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $270k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $250k → 17%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $105k → 9%TROUT UNLIMITED: $25k → 7%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $270k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $250k → 17%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $90k → 9%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $220k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $250k → 17%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $65k → 9%CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $170k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $250k → 17%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $55k → 9%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL: $250k → 17%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $50k → 9%CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY: $30k → 9%DELAWARE ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $65k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500k → 7%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $470k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $75k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $395k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $35k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $320k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $295k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $295k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $270k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250k → 17%DELAWARE WILD LANDS: $25k → 10%AMNH: $120k → 17%AMNH: $70k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
DE
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Wildwood Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Wildwood Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 23 repeat orgs$591k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$7.4M
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+1025%

Still filing today

74%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KN
    KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $355k · revenue +52%
  • DW
    DELAWARE WILD LANDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +1%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $175k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • WM
    Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • GREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +19%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED - CONSERVATION ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
3
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
4
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
5
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
7
National Ecological Observatory Network Inc

To enable understanding and forecasting of the impacts of climate change, land-use change, and invasive species on continental-scale ecology by providing support for infrastructure and consistent methodologies to support research and…

Recreation & Sports
8
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
11
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inaturalist; the most unlike its peers is Citytrack Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY: $1,510,000 · OtherCORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGYWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $750,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYKALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION: $355,000 · OtherKALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATIONDELAWARE WILD LANDS INC: $260,000 · OtherDELAWARE WILD LANDS INCWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $250,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICINEWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $250,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $214,000 · OtherAMNH: $190,000 · Other+6 more: $201,500 · OtherAmerican Museum of Natural History: $2,545,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History+1 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $585,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT …THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $125,000 · EnvironmentTHE MONTANA …THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC: $95,000 · EnvironmentTHE VERMONT …AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $60,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIV…BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE: $50,000 · EnvironmentBRANDYWINE R…+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentCornell University: $125,000 · EducationROLLINS COLLEGE: $55,000 · EducationGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $40,000 · EducationMontana State University Foundation Inc: $8,000 · EducationTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $175,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · AnimalsCITYTRACK INCORPORATED: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · International
Other$4,480,500Arts & Culture$2,570,000Environment$920,000Education$228,000Animals$215,000Recreation & Sports$75,000International$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $2,545,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $585,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION: $355,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetDELAWARE WILD LANDS INC: $260,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $214,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $125,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDELAWARE ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $100,000 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetTHE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC: $95,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSPRING ISLAND TRUST FOUNDATION INC: $80,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetCITYTRACK INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 8y, 50% of budgetAMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $60,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINATURALIST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds KALMAR NYCKEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE WILD LANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRING ISLAND TRUST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYTRACK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ROLLINS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRANDYWINE RED CLAY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds GREENS FARMS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIRDING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INATURALIST ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wildwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wildwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Kalmar Nyckel Foundation: 14% of income from government
  • Sea Education Association Inc: 12% of income from government
  • The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wildwood’s filings →

More from the funding graph