Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wessel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$137k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of The Wessel Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Abilene Christian University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Wessel Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $203k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
5
’18
7
’19
6
’20
5
’21
3
’22
4
’23
4
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MInternational$625kHuman Services$116kYouth Development$41kReligion$10kHealth$7k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $137k
$22,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RWANDA CHILDREN$137,006
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$25,000
CHILDRENS VISION INTERNATIONAL INC$22,000
TEEN LIFELINE INC$11,000
CHRISTS HAVEN FOR CHILDREN$4,585
COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $21k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+69%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Rwanda Children
    8× · 2017–2024 · $531k · revenue +107%
  • LE
    Liberty Educational Ministries Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $499k · revenue +39%
  • FC
    FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • GS
    Global Samaritan Resources Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +30%
  • OF
    OUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
2
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
3
Liberty Christian School Inc

To provide quality educational services to students in grades kindergarten through twelve, in a Christ-centered environment.

Education
4
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Providence Christian Academy

In dependence upon Almighty God, for His glory alone, and together with family and church, the mission of Providence Christian Academy is to provide exemplary education for the vulnerable in the light of God's Word for time and eternity.

Education
7
Empower African Children

To create transformative and globally connected learning experiences, preparing orphaned and vulnerable children for a lifetime of influence.

—
8
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
9
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
10
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
11
Oconee Christian Academy

Oconee Christian Academy exists to glorify God by nurturing students and equipping them to fulfill God's unique purpose for their lives.

Education
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Christian School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Samaritan Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,688,500 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYRwanda Children: $530,769 · OtherRwanda Children+3 more: $40,332 · OtherLiberty Educational Ministries Inc: $499,179 · ReligionLiberty Educational M…CHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL: $77,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S VISION INT…+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $100,455 · EducationCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $89,500 · Human ServicesTEEN LIFELINE INC: $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal Samaritan Resources Inc: $17,077 · International
Other$2,259,601Religion$586,179Education$100,455Human Services$89,500Youth Development$41,000International$17,077

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,688,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRwanda Children: $530,769 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetLiberty Educational Ministries Inc: $499,179 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $100,455 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $89,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL: $77,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTEEN LIFELINE INC: $41,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $26,115 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rwanda Children ↗
  • Who funds Liberty Educational Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TEEN LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds Global Samaritan Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wessel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wessel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wessel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph