Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wessel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2018
6
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$137k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of The Wessel Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Abilene Christian University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Wessel Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $203k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
5
18
7
19
6
20
5
21
3
22
4
23
4
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.3MInternational$625kHuman Services$116kYouth Development$41kReligion$10kHealth$7k
02FY2018 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $137k
$22,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RWANDA CHILDREN$137,006
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$25,000
CHILDRENS VISION INTERNATIONAL INC$22,000
TEEN LIFELINE INC$11,000
CHRISTS HAVEN FOR CHILDREN$4,585
COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $21k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+69%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Rwanda Children
    8× · 2017–2024 · $531k · revenue +107%
  • LE
    Liberty Educational Ministries Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $499k · revenue +39%
  • FC
    FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • GS
    Global Samaritan Resources Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $17k · revenue +30%
  • OF
    OUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
2
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
3
Liberty Christian School Inc

To provide quality educational services to students in grades kindergarten through twelve, in a Christ-centered environment.

Education
4
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Providence Christian Academy

In dependence upon Almighty God, for His glory alone, and together with family and church, the mission of Providence Christian Academy is to provide exemplary education for the vulnerable in the light of God's Word for time and eternity.

Education
7
Empower African Children

To create transformative and globally connected learning experiences, preparing orphaned and vulnerable children for a lifetime of influence.

8
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
9
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
10
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
11
Oconee Christian Academy

Oconee Christian Academy exists to glorify God by nurturing students and equipping them to fulfill God's unique purpose for their lives.

Education
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Faith Christian School Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Samaritan Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,688,500 · OtherABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYRwanda Children — $530,769 · OtherRwanda Children+3 more — $40,332 · OtherLiberty Educational Ministries Inc — $499,179 · ReligionLiberty Educational M…CHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL — $77,000 · ReligionCHILDREN'S VISION INT…+1 more — $10,000 · ReligionFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $100,455 · EducationCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $89,500 · Human ServicesTEEN LIFELINE INC — $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal Samaritan Resources Inc — $17,077 · International
Other$2,259,601Religion$586,179Education$100,455Human Services$89,500Youth Development$41,000International$17,077

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,688,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRwanda Children — $530,769 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetLiberty Educational Ministries Inc — $499,179 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $100,455 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $89,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL — $77,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTEEN LIFELINE INC — $41,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc — $26,115 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Rwanda Children
  • Who funds Liberty Educational Ministries Inc
  • Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S VISION INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds TEEN LIFELINE INC
  • Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc
  • Who funds Global Samaritan Resources Inc
  • Who funds OUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wessel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph