· Public charity
The University Corporation
On behalf of california state university, northridge, THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION performs a number of activities including operating the campus bookstore, food services, vending operations, administration of various funds and grants, managing campus faculty/staff housing program, off-campus research and administrative building, as well…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $3,203,008 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,995,224 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,792,216 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $419k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE | $769,354 |
| NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION | $684,784 |
| TATAVIAM LAND CONSERVANCY | $298,335 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI | $207,758 |
| FERNANDENO TATAVIAM BAND OF MISSION INDIANS | $191,201 |
| CAL STATE LA UNIVERSITY AUXILIARY SERVICES INC | $131,895 |
| NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $129,592 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $99,329 |
| RANCHO RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $73,768 |
| LOS ANGELES VALLEY COLLEGE | $64,757 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES | $58,966 |
| LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT - MISSION COLLEGE | $55,269 |
| AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION - APA | $48,476 |
| LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT - PIERCE COLLEGE | $46,698 |
| CSU DOMINGUEZ HILLS FOUNDATION | $44,363 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
62 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Trustees of Princeton University9× · 2017–2025 · $512k · revenue +5%- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $412k · revenue +27%
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC5× · 2019–2025 · $312k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- OSOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $129k
- DSDISCOVERY SCIENCE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $109k
- JSJACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $61k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…
The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State University Long Beach Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIERCE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Tataviam Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FERNANDENO TATAVIAM BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Rancho Research Institute ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds TARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Foundation for California Community Colleges · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Johns Hopkins University · Weingart Foundation · Community Partners · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · The Nature Conservancy
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The University Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends Research Institute Inc — 63% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Pacific University — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.