Skip to content
The United Way Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The United Way Inc

Our mission is to improve lives through the caring power of community.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$325k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$6.1MYouth Development$5.0MEducation$1.9MCommunity Improvement$889kEmployment$710kPhilanthropy$553kHealth$488kPublic Safety & Disaster$407kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $1,784,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,059,129 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $274,629 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $866k
  • $250k+2 grants · $600k
$46,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAVERICK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$325,000
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$275,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS$230,000
CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS$140,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$100,000
PANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING$95,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA$75,000
SALVATION ARMY INC$60,000
GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST TEXAS$60,000
ST HELEN'S OUTREACH$55,000
AMARILLO COMING HOME$50,000
WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$46,500
7 STAR HORSE THERAPY$40,000
THE LEADERS READERS NETWORK$35,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TEXAS CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: $69k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $18k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 14%COMMUNITY OPTIONS: $18k → 9%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $75k → 9%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $75k → 9%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $68k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $328k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $66k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $312k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $66k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $279k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $20k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $275k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $20k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $259k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $13k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $235k → 20%JAN WERNER ADULT DAY CARE: $9k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $229k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $221k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $205k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $29k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $21k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $16k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $12k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 20%SNACK PAK 4 KIDS: $11k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $11k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 20%SNACK PAK 4 KIDS: $9k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $43k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $30k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $30k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $18k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $15k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $14k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $13k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $12k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 38 repeat orgs$398k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
29

Total granted

$17M
$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+19%

Still filing today

66%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +52% · 34% of their budget
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +42%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • TC
    Texas Christian Community Development Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $69k · revenue +217% · 45% of their budget
  • TP
    TEXAS PANHANDLE MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL RETARDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • AA
    AMARILLO AREA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · 38% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Central Texas Community Health Centers

Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.

Health
3
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
4
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
5
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
6
Hendrick Home for Children
—
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
8
Texas Center for Child and Family Studies

To strengthen the lives of children and families.

Human Services
9
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
10
Austin Travis County Mhmr Center Dba Integral Care

Atcic's mission is to improve the lives of people affected by behavioral health and developmental and/or intellectual challenges.

Health
11
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
12
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amarillo Wesley Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/51
Grantees still filing
26/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC: $1,550,449 · OtherCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INCGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,159,295 · OtherGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AME…PANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISS: $814,764 · OtherPANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $752,995 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGOODWILL OF NORTHWEST TEXAS: $709,871 · OtherGOODWILL OF NORTHWEST TEXASGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA: $623,996 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMAAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $483,326 · OtherAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $390,191 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INC: $286,482 · Other+39 more: $1,513,240 · Other+39 moreFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $2,475,230 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMA…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $1,163,849 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXA…AMARILLO MULTISERVICE CENTER FOR THE AGING INC: $426,261 · Human ServicesAMARILLO MULTISERVICE CENTER F…THE BRIDGE: $185,270 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $175,758 · Human Services+7 more: $201,013 · Human ServicesMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC: $3,080,117 · Youth DevelopmentMAVERICK BOYS & GIRL…TYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC: $646,547 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAS BEST CHARITIES: $255,628 · PhilanthropyLOCAL INDEPENDENT CHARITIES OF TEXAS: $11,820 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,202 · PhilanthropyFAMILY CARE FOUNDATION: $97,968 · HealthCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC: $63,170 · HealthHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $9,200 · HealthHOPE CHOICE INC: $7,226 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $6,900 · HealthAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $87,721 · Civil Rights
Other$8,284,609Human Services$4,627,381Youth Development$3,080,117Recreation & Sports$646,547Philanthropy$272,650Health$184,464Civil Rights$87,721

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC: $3,080,117 over 9y, 34% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $2,475,230 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC: $1,550,449 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE: $1,163,849 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,159,295 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC: $646,547 over 8y, 72% of budgetAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $483,326 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetAMARILLO MULTISERVICE CENTER FOR THE AGING INC: $426,261 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $286,482 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAS BEST CHARITIES: $255,628 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $185,270 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $178,978 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $175,758 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $124,530 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC: $116,520 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $110,366 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY CARE FOUNDATION: $97,968 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $87,721 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $71,843 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTexas Christian Community Development Network: $69,325 over 1y, 45% of budgetCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC: $63,170 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INC: $47,819 over 3y, 11% of budgetREFUGEE SERVICES OF TEXAS INC: $41,155 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $39,232 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Leaders Readers Network: $35,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFAITH CITY INC: $22,879 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES: $20,077 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMARILLO AREA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $18,285 over 1y, 38% of budgetCommunity Options Inc: $18,149 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMARILLO SWIM AND SPORTS: $14,667 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetMARTHA'S HOME INC: $14,196 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLOCAL INDEPENDENT CHARITIES OF TEXAS: $11,820 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSQUARE MILE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CHISHOLM TRAIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $9,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNo Boundaries International Inc: $9,200 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE BOYS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS: $7,490 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE CHOICE INC: $7,226 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $6,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $6,081 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTURN CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,894 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASCENSION ACADEMY: $5,660 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $5,347 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHUTCHINSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC: $5,202 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $5,097 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF AMARILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO MULTISERVICE CENTER FOR THE AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS BEST CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds THE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Christian Community Development Network ↗
  • Who funds COALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE SERVICES OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN STAR HORSE AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Leaders Readers Network ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…Mary E Bivins Foundat…High Plains Christian…Josephine Anderson Ch…The Don & Sybil Harri…Kimble Foundation Tru…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Mays FoundationCj and Syble Fowlston…Xcel Energy FoundationWilliam & Louise Mull…Amarillo Business Fou…
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX83.3× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Mays Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Xcel Energy Foundation · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Community Options Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home