Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Mary E Bivins Foundation

The mary e.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.9MFood & Nutrition$1.8MHuman Services$1.7MEducation$1.4MHousing & Shelter$934kYouth Development$725kArts & Culture$487kRecreation & Sports$430kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $2,570,870 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,719,227 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $148,357 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $377k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$55,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$139M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER IN$300,000
ASPIRE A MINDFUL PLACE$235,000
WEST TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT$198,000
FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO$175,000
PANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISS$150,000
THE MAVERICK BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF$146,500
REFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT$125,000
AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$123,000
CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICE INC$100,000
AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC$100,000
MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTIT$100,000
OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC$100,000
AMARILLO SYMPHONY INC$90,000
PARTNERS OF THE COMING HOME PROGRAM$80,000
TURN CENTER$60,370
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DALHART SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION: $93k → 11%WHEELER AREA ACTIVITIES & IMPROVEME: $38k → 15%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $30k → 18%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ABA: $100k → 9%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES I: $85k → 11%CANADIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 11%HEREFORD REGIONAL SPORTSPLEX: $50k → 17%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $15k → 18%CATHOLIC FAMILY SERVICE INC: $100k → 20%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR THE CHILDREN: $60k → 9%HEREFORD SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATIO: $38k → 17%DONLEY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $12k → 18%DUMAS EDUCATION & SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $150k → 12%HEREFORD SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATIO: $25k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS OF DALHART: $25k → 11%HEREFORD SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATIO: $11k → 17%DALHART SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $25k → 11%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $25k → 14%CCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 9%DALHART SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION: $13k → 11%BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%CCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF DALHART: $13k → 11%DALHART MEALS ON WHEELS: $8k → 11%DUMAS EDUCATION & SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $25k → 12%PARC: $100k → 20%DUMAS EDUCATION & SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $17k → 12%THE PARC: $91k → 20%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $74k → 20%AMARILLO HEARING FOUNDATION: $55k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $50k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $40k → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $34k → 20%SEVEN STAR HORSE & FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 9%SEVEN STAR HORSE & FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 9%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $25k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $20k → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 20%PANHANLDE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13k → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 20%REFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT: $125k → 20%AMARILLO AREA MENTAL HEALTH CONSUME: $10k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO: $175k → 20%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $50k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 52 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
80

Total granted

$5.9M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+9%

Still filing today

90%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $300k · revenue +28%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO
    3× · 2018–2024 · $235k · revenue +27%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $208k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • HT
    HOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -58%
  • OH
    OGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +142% · 61% of their budget
  • SI
    STORYBRIDGE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hendrick Home for Children
—
2
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
3
Amarillo Spca

Welfare of homeless animals

Animals
4
Aaf Community Health Foundation

Support organization of amarillo area foundation, inc. to provide and support medical and health care facilities, services, and education in amarillo, texas, and the texas panhandle area.

Health
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Downtown Amarillo Inc

Downtown amarillo, inc. is committed to making downtown amarillo a vibrant and attractive place.

Community Improvement
7
Center City of Amarillo Inc

Center city of amarillo, inc., brings people to downtown amarillo through organization, events, promotion, design and facilitation of economic restructuring.

Community Improvement
8
Central Texas Hospitality House

Our mission is to meet the spiritual and practical needs of the families of prisoners. We strive to provide a safe and caring home in whichfamilies can rest while visiting loved ones currently incarcerated in the adjacent prison system.

—
9
Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

Healthy Family Services of Texas is dedicated to promoting the physical, mental, and emotional health of our patients by offering comprehensive healthcare services and wellness programs.

Health
10
Mission Texarkana Inc

The center is a care provider rendering life sustaining assistance to the indigent and job training and placement for able bodied clients withouth regard to religious preference, political affiliation, sex, race, handicap, or other…

Human Services
11
Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

—
12
Tejas Health Care

To provide primary health and dental care to the underserved of fayette and lee counties, texas.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amarillo Wesley Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Casa of the Rolling Plains. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCrisis Support & Family Ser…Youth Sports OrganizationsDallas Public InstitutionsFaith-Based Social ServicesAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…Independent Schools & Early…Catholic Healthcare NetworksDallas Social ServicesAffordable Housing ProvidersSocial Justice & AdvocacyEmployee Benefit Trusts & L…Dallas Business & Civic Ass…Food Assistance & Community…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%13%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr15%16%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr14%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%4%<5yr16%17%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr14%30%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/148
the rest of the field
17%
2,690/15,726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
130/132
Grantees still filing
74/132
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $380,290 · OtherAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INCOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC — $300,000 · OtherOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INCPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $300,000 · OtherPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INCTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $238,000 · OtherPANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISS — $175,000 · OtherLEE BIVINS FOUNDATION — $190,000 · OtherMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $189,278 · Other+66 more — $2,988,340 · Other+66 moreFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO — $235,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE — $208,465 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF TH…DUMAS EDUCATION AND SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC — $192,400 · Human ServicesDUMAS EDUCATION AND SOCI…THE PARC — $191,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARCPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $160,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CH…DALHART SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION — $130,182 · Human ServicesDALHART SENIOR CITIZENS …REFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT — $125,000 · Human ServicesFAITH CITY INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $87,200 · Human ServicesCOLORFUL CLOSETS OF AMARILLO INC — $86,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC OF DALHART TEXAS — $85,000 · Human Services+18 more — $800,994 · Human Services+18 moreTURN CENTER — $310,370 · HealthTURN CENTERASPIRE A MINDFUL PLACE — $235,000 · HealthASPIRE A MINDF…OGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthOGH HEALTHCARE…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO — $150,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONAL…DALLAM-HARTLEY COUNTIES HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $105,723 · HealthDALLAM-HARTLEY…MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $100,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL…COALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC — $75,000 · HealthHEMPHILL COUNTY REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $66,000 · HealthCollingsworth County Home Delivered Meals Program — $48,200 · Health+8 more — $151,375 · Health+8 moreWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $550,401 · EducationSTORYBRIDGE INC — $150,000 · EducationThe Leaders Readers Network — $51,500 · EducationFriends of the Amarillo Library — $29,800 · Education+2 more — $45,000 · EducationHOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $190,000 · PhilanthropyMOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $59,300 · PhilanthropyTRI-COUNTY MEALS — $52,422 · PhilanthropyPANHANDLE OF TEXAS LIONS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $7,200 · PhilanthropyAMARILLO SYMPHONY INC — $120,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC — $78,100 · Arts & CultureWE FIND IN LOVE — $75,000 · Arts & CulturePANHANDLE-PLAINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureDON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO LITTLE THEATER INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureAMARILLO ART CENTER ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $27,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS INC OF AMARILLO — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC — $125,000 · Recreation & SportsSPEARHEAD CORPORATION — $62,000 · Recreation & SportsGARRETSON CENTER INC — $55,942 · Recreation & SportsAMARILLO TRI-STATE EXPOSITION — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsEASTRIDGE MISSION CENTER — $37,042 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$4,760,908Human Services$2,401,241Health$1,441,668Education$826,701Philanthropy$583,922Arts & Culture$520,100Recreation & Sports$487,484

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $550,401 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $380,290 over 2y, 17% of budgetTURN CENTER — $310,370 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC — $300,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $300,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetHOPE TO OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $238,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO — $235,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetASPIRE A MINDFUL PLACE — $235,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE — $208,465 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetOGH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetDUMAS EDUCATION AND SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC — $192,400 over 3y, 26% of budgetTHE PARC — $191,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $190,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLEE BIVINS FOUNDATION — $190,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $189,278 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $160,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSTORYBRIDGE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetKIDS INC OF AMARILLO — $150,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO — $150,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCactus Nazarene Ministry Center — $135,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetDALHART SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION — $130,182 over 3y, 22% of budgetTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC — $125,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetREFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT — $125,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetAMARILLO SYMPHONY INC — $120,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetDALLAM-HARTLEY COUNTIES HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $105,723 over 2y, 12% of budgetAMARILLO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $104,246 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetHIGH PLAINS CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetSILVERTON DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetCETA CANYON CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFAITH CITY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHIGH PLAINS RETREAT CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $87,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORFUL CLOSETS OF AMARILLO INC — $86,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $85,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC OF DALHART TEXAS — $85,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $83,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetVICTORY TREE FOUNDATION — $81,944 over 3y, 22% of budgetWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC — $78,100 over 2y, 16% of budgetGREAT PLAINS CASA FOR KIDS INC — $75,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE — $75,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetWE FIND IN LOVE — $75,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE — $75,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHEREFORD SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION INC — $74,580 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetMOORE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC — $66,450 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetPAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $65,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…Josephine Anderson Ch…The Don & Sybil Harri…High Plains Christian…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Cj and Syble Fowlston…Kimble Foundation Tru…The United Way IncBrumley FoundationAmarillo Business Fou…David D & Nona S Payn…Mays Foundation
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX205.9× affinity106 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Kimble Foundation Trust · The United Way Inc · Brumley Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc · Mays Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary E Bivins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home