Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation

Financial support of charitable organizations.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$62MEducation$6.0MMembership Benefit$3.0MHealth$2.2MYouth Development$988kReligion$595kPhilanthropy$586kRecreation & Sports$429kArts & Culture$331kOther$19M
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $561k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+4 grants · $15M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$576M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,648,105
WATERFRONT CHURCH DC$2,600,000
THE LIVING STONE CHURCH$868,000
DENISON FORUM$750,000
MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE$240,000
WTAMU FOUNDATION$189,000
HEAL THE CITY$156,000
HOPE CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTERS AND MENTORING PROGRAMS$150,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$150,000
HIGH PLAINS RETREAT CENTER$147,150
OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL$130,000
HARRINGTON CANCER AND HEALTH FOUNDATION$125,000
AMARILLO MERCY MINISTRIES$98,000
ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE$75,000
AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $61.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 9%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $50k → 9%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $30k → 9%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $25k → 9%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $10k → 9%BUCKNER FAMILY SERVICES: $23k → 20%TRANSFORMATIONS BY AMARILLO ANGELS: $8k → 9%BUCKNER FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 20%ADVO COMPANIES INC: $100k → 9%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10.6M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10.3M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10.1M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8.3M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7.1M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5.7M → 20%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4.0M → 20%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 9%BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3.8M → 20%FAITH CITY MINISTRIES: $200k → 20%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 9%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 9%REFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT: $22k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 9%FAITH CITY MINISTRIES: $100k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $100k → 20%THE PANAHNDLE ADULT REBUILDING CENTER: $100k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $75k → 20%REFUGEE LANGUAGE PROJECT: $10k → 9%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $60k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $60k → 20%PANHANDLE ADULT REBUILDING CENTER: $40k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $40k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $40k → 20%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $40k → 20%BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $48k → 20%THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $25k → 20%BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$92M · 85 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

85 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
39

Total granted

$92M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-6%

Still filing today

67%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $478k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60M · revenue +57% · 32% of their budget
  • HC
    HARRINGTON CANCER AND HEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $721k · revenue +118%
  • HC
    HOPE CHOICE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $720k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • TH
    TTU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $360k
  • PN
    PANHANDLE NUC INC
    one grant, 2018 · $120k · revenue -94%
  • PM
    PLAINS MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -96% · 42% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Hendrick Home for Children
—
3
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
4
Children's Home of Lubbock and Family Service Agency Inc

Working in creative collaboration to provide quality care that transforms the lives of at-risk children and their families through the active compassion of christ.

Human Services
5
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
6
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
7
Compassion Ministries of Waco

It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.

Community Improvement
8
Texas Baptist Children's Home and Family Services Inc

Provision and management of property on which a family of nonprofit ministries carries out programs and services for vulnerable children and families.

Human Services
9
Concho Valley Biblical Counseling Center

To assist people through life's struggles by spiritually guiding individuals by encouraging, offering biblical counseling and educating individuals with tools and skills to cope with life's difficult situations. it is the desire of the…

Health
10
Texas Center for Child and Family Studies

To strengthen the lives of children and families.

Human Services
11
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
12
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life Challlenge of Amarillo Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Baptist General Convention. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVulnerable Population Suppo…Senior Housing and Care Ser…Community Recreation & ArtsPanhandle Regional Organiza…School & Youth Sports Boost…Amarillo Area Philanthropic…Regional Healthcare Organiz…Residential Care and Crisis…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr13%13%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr13%19%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr21%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr13%75%5–10yr16%6%10–20yr13%5%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr21%10%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/141
the rest of the field
11%
123/1,161

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/90
Grantees still filing
48/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $59,920,716 · Human ServicesBAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES+16 more — $1,956,700 · Human ServicesWATERFRONT CHURCH DC — $3,530,000 · OtherWATERFRONT CHURCH DCDENISON MINISTRIES — $3,175,300 · OtherDENISON MINISTRIESLIVING STONE CHURCH — $1,332,300 · OtherLIVING STONE CHURCHHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC — $1,043,000 · OtherAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC — $745,084 · OtherHARRINGTON CANCER AND HEALTH FOUNDATION — $721,000 · Other+85 more — $9,774,403 · Other+85 moreWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $4,802,040 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $660,000 · Education+9 more — $493,130 · EducationBAPTIST COMMUNITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOUNDATION — $2,514,578 · Membership BenefitHIGH PLAINS RETREAT CENTER — $527,850 · Membership BenefitHOPE CHOICE INC — $720,000 · HealthTURN CENTER — $335,161 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO — $300,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $240,000 · HealthATC HEALTH PROMOTION FOUNDATION — $212,609 · HealthCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC — $148,000 · HealthPLAINS MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Health+5 more — $137,800 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $450,900 · Youth DevelopmentMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $330,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $207,500 · Youth DevelopmentMISSION AMARILLO — $340,500 · ReligionCETA CANYON CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $128,500 · ReligionSHARING HOPE MINISTRY INC — $80,500 · ReligionCactus Nazarene Ministry Center — $25,000 · ReligionTOP O TEXAS EDUCATIONAL BROADCASTING FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Religion
Human Services$61,877,416Other$20,321,087Education$5,955,170Membership Benefit$3,042,428Health$2,193,570Youth Development$988,400Religion$594,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES — $59,920,716 over 8y, 32% of budgetWEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION — $4,802,040 over 4y, 16% of budgetBAPTIST COMMUNITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOUNDATION — $2,514,578 over 5y, 17% of budgetAMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC — $745,084 over 2y, 45% of budgetHARRINGTON CANCER AND HEALTH FOUNDATION — $721,000 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetHOPE CHOICE INC — $720,000 over 7y, 8.3% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $660,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $633,565 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetHIGH PLAINS RETREAT CENTER — $527,850 over 5y, 27% of budgetAMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC — $470,522 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $450,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC — $432,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE — $415,000 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION AMARILLO — $340,500 over 5y, 36% of budgetLIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INC — $339,500 over 4y, 21% of budgetTURN CENTER — $335,161 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC — $330,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO — $300,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetFAITH CITY INC — $300,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK — $295,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHAPTER OF NATIONAL AMBUCS INC — $282,543 over 3y, 90% of budgetTYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC — $241,400 over 5y, 13% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $240,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE — $230,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $215,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $215,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetATC HEALTH PROMOTION FOUNDATION — $212,609 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $207,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTRIDGE MISSION CENTER — $187,220 over 6y, 21% of budgetAMARILLO WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $185,500 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetCANYON HOPE MINISTRIES — $170,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetSAN JACINTO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $167,851 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE — $160,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHidden Falls Ranch — $150,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetCOALITION OF HEALTH SERVICES INC — $148,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN — $145,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PARC — $140,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCETA CANYON CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $128,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTEXAS PANHANDLE INDEPENDENT FUTURES FOUNDATION — $127,500 over 2y, 35% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS BY AUSTIN ANGELS — $123,450 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE — $121,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetPANHANDLE NUC INC — $120,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetPLAINS MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetADVO COMPANIES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMOORE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC — $85,900 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAPTIST COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS A&M UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST COMMUNITY AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOL AND DRUGS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRINGTON CANCER AND HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION AMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHALLLENGE OF AMARILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAVERICK BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMARILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANK PHILLIPS COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHAPTER OF NATIONAL AMBUCS INC ↗
  • Who funds TYLER STREET RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE TEXAS PANHANDLE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PANHANDLE WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATC HEALTH PROMOTION FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…Mary E Bivins Foundat…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Josephine Anderson Ch…Mays FoundationAmarillo Business Fou…Kimble Foundation Tru…Cj and Syble Fowlston…The United Way IncThe Don & Sybil Harri…William & Louise Mull…Bruckner Family Found…
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX130.5× affinity66 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mays Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · The United Way Inc · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 141 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines