Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas Hodge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$62kInternational$52kAnimals$43kHousing & Shelter$39kFood & Nutrition$37kHuman Services$31kEducation$17kEnvironment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
19
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Asante Foundation$5,000
Kerr County Flood Relief Fund$2,000
World Central Kitchen$1,500
Doctors Without Borders$1,500
San Francisco-Marin Food Bank$1,500
Bay Area Rescue Mission$1,500
Planned Parenthood$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Habitat For Humanity East Bay$1,000
Habitat For Humanity Greater San Francisco$1,000
Canal Alliance$1,000
Mercy Ships$1,000
Meals On Wheels Of Alameda County$1,000
International Rescue Committee$1,000
Vivalon$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA: $1k → 10%Covenant House Of California: $1k → 10%Covenant House Of California: $1k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA: $500 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA: $500 → 10%MEDFORD SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 13%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $500 → 10%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 11%Covenant House Of California: $500 → 10%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA: $250 → 10%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 11%COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $400 → 11%Guide Dogs Of The Blind: $250 → 8%THORN: $500 → 17%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $500 → 10%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $500 → 10%Sparkle Foundation: $250 → 8%LITTLE WISHES: $500 → 8%LITTLE WISHES: $500 → 8%LITTLE WISHES: $500 → 8%LITTLE WISHES: $500 → 8%LITTLE WISHES: $200 → 8%Vivalon: $1k → 8%Ritter House: $1k → 8%RITTER CENTER: $1k → 8%Vivalon: $1k → 8%Ritter Center: $1k → 8%Ritter Center: $1k → 8%RITTER CENTER: $500 → 8%RITTER CENTER: $500 → 8%VIVALON: $500 → 8%RITTER CENTER: $500 → 8%RITTER CENTER: $500 → 8%Vivalon: $300 → 8%SUPPLY BANKORG: $500 → 10%SUPPLY BANKORG: $350 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 97 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

97 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
52

Total granted

$310k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+9%

Still filing today

74%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +68%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +81%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • RC
    REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -96%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -59%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
7
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
10
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Medford Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
111/111
Grantees still filing
81/111
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $14,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKPlanned Parenthood: $10,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,500 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST: $9,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $6,000 · OtherOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $7,000 · OtherGLIDE FOUNDATION: $5,700 · Other+83 more: $108,054 · Other+83 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $13,500 · InternationalInternational Res…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…Save The Children Federation Inc: $4,750 · InternationalSave The Children…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $4,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR A…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KIT…REMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $2,850 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $2,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $2,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 · International+7 more: $5,000 · International+7 moreBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $8,800 · Human ServicesBAY AREA RESCU…RITTER CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesRITTER CENTERAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,350 · Human ServicesAmerican Natio…COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,250 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE…COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $4,650 · Human ServicesCOACHELLA VALL…LITTLE WISHES: $3,700 · Human ServicesLITTLE WISHESWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIO…Vivalon: $2,800 · Human ServicesVivalonGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,000 · Human Services+7 more: $4,100 · Human Services+7 moreTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,650 · AnimalsTHE AMERI…MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,650 · AnimalsMARIN HUM…Keepers of the Wild: $3,300 · AnimalsKeepers o…Last Chance for Animals: $3,250 · AnimalsLast Chan…NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL …PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $2,200 · AnimalsPEOPLE FO…FARM SANCTUARY INC: $1,600 · AnimalsFARM SANC…PROJECT K9 HERO: $1,550 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $1,300 · AnimalsOregon Tiger Sanctuary: $1,300 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,250 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,000 · Animals+6 more: $2,100 · Animals+6 moreASANTE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · HealthANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $3,500 · HealthLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 · HealthGO2 For Lung Cancer: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health+4 more: $1,150 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $11,500 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Bound of Marin: $5,850 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $500 · Housing & ShelterMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $7,550 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $4,100 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand: $2,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$170,754International$54,600Human Services$45,650Animals$29,650Health$22,650Housing & Shelter$19,850Food & Nutrition$14,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $8,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $7,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRITTER CENTER: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $5,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLIDE FOUNDATION: $5,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC: $5,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $4,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $4,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE WISHES: $3,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKeepers of the Wild: $3,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLast Chance for Animals: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $3,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $2,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVivalon: $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Open Hand: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds RITTER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE WISHES ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Keepers of the Wild ↗
  • Who funds Last Chance for Animals ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE24.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Robert K & Barbara J Straus Family Foundation Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas Hodge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas Hodge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Lead Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Thomas Hodge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Thomas Hodge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas Hodge’s filings →

More from the funding graph