Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sunshine Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Animals$7.4MRecreation & Sports$7.3MHealth$6.3MScience & Tech$2.6MHuman Services$1.2MEducation$1.0MYouth Development$322kPhilanthropy$316kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $201k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $385k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.6M
$5,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ducks Unlimited Inc$1,028,000
Door County YMCA$510,000
National Wrestling Coaches Association Inc$450,000
FARE$333,333
Northwestern Memorial Foundation$250,000
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center$150,000
Delta Waterfowl Foundation$100,000
University of Chicago$85,000
Start Early (FKA Ounce of Prevention Fund)$50,000
National Alopecia Areata Foundation$40,000
USA Wrestling$29,757
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Foundation$20,000
Gorton Community Center$11,000
Help Our Military Heroes Inc$10,000
Galena School District #120$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Chi-Care: $1k → 14%Gorton Community Center: $20k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $15k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $11k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $10k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $10k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $10k → 8%Gorton Community Center: $10k → 8%Charles Tillman Cornerstone Foundation: $1k → 8%Charles Tillman Cornerstone Foundation: $1k → 8%Mothers Trust Foundation: $1k → 8%Charles Tillman Cornerstone Foundation: $1k → 8%Charles Tillman Cornerstone Foundation: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
SC
DC
OK
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Sunshine Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Sunshine Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 80 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

80 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
33

Total granted

$44M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+27%

Still filing today

68%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5.4M · revenue +33%
  • LP
    LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
    4× · 2018–2021 · $2.8M · revenue +19%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • CC
    Chicago Cred Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue +41%
  • MG
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • NW
    NATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME
    one grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
4
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
5
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

9
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Cred Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Public Library OperationsElementary Literacy TutoringAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%48%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/81
Grantees still filing
62/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FARE — $20,144,000 · OtherFAREDucks Unlimited Inc — $6,779,500 · OtherDucks Unlimited Inc+69 more — $4,244,201 · Other+69 moreNorthwestern University — $5,375,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern Uni…NATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSOCIATION — $1,375,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL WRESTLI…+3 more — $15,500 · Recreation & SportsLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $2,750,000 · HealthLUCILE PAC…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,000,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…National Alopecia Areata Foundation — $310,000 · HealthNational A…+13 more — $364,500 · Health+13 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $2,495,000 · EducationPresident…Door County YMCA INC — $1,031,000 · EducationDoor Coun…University of Chicago — $152,500 · Education+15 more — $527,500 · Education+15 moreDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $550,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $50,000 · AnimalsTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC — $25,000 · Animals+2 more — $11,000 · AnimalsChicago Cred Inc — $250,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME — $200,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $25,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHIRD AVENUE PLAYHOUSE INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$31,167,701Recreation & Sports$6,765,500Health$4,424,500Education$4,206,000Animals$636,000Employment$250,000Arts & Culture$250,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorthwestern University — $5,375,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $2,750,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $2,495,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSOCIATION — $1,375,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetDoor County YMCA INC — $1,031,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $550,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetNational Alopecia Areata Foundation — $310,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetChicago Cred Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Lake County — $226,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetNATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME — $200,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $152,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDES PLAINES WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS — $95,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetAMES EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $94,500 over 7y, 19% of budgetGorton Community Center — $86,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $80,000 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHelp Our Military Heroes Inc — $70,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC — $65,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetErikson Institute — $47,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGlenbard South Boosters Organization — $45,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetSpirit of 67 Foundation — $40,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $40,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNational Louis University — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE FOREST HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetSTART EARLY — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCURED NFP — $33,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetDOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC — $33,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $31,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CHICAGOLAND WEST — $30,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LEE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Chicago Community Partners — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD AVENUE PLAYHOUSE INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds NATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Door County YMCA INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  • Who funds National Alopecia Areata Foundation
  • Who funds Chicago Cred Inc
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake County
  • Who funds NATIONAL WRESTLING HALL OF FAME
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
  • Who funds DES PLAINES WETLANDS CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP FOR EOSINOPHILIC DISORDERS
  • Who funds AMES EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Gorton Community Center
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DOOR COUNTY INC
  • Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC
  • Who funds Help Our Military Heroes Inc
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL23.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Baxter International Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · The Gorter Family Foundation · The Grainger Foundation Inc · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Door County Community Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Mmg Foundation Inc · Lutsey Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sunshine Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sunshine Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sunshine Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph