How much does The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation give?

The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation reported 43 grants totaling $878,840 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 43 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (41%), Education (25%), Animals (13%).

Who are The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Yeshiva Tiferes Naftoli ($72k), Staten Island Zoological Society Inc ($50k), Zoological Society of Philadelphia ($50k).

Does The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 9% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, Verizon Foundation, The Pfizer Foundation Inc.

Where is The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation based?

The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation is based in NJ.

The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation

The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$879k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$390k

Largest

01What it funds

0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$849kEducation$524kAnimals$265kPhilanthropy$114kEnvironment$48kHealth$39kHuman Services$29kInternational$20kOther$0

02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k39 grants · $97k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$250k+2 grants · $700k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
CHABAD Jewish Center	$390,000
Notre Dame Academy	$310,000
Yeshiva Tiferes Naftoli	$72,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation	$10,000
Individual grant recipient	$7,500
World Wildlife Fund	$5,000
Fulfill Monmouth and Ocean	$5,000
Friends of the Israel Defense	$5,000
Individual grant recipient	$5,000
ASPCA	$5,000
Lustgarten Foundation	$4,000
Monmouth County SPCA	$3,750
Individual grant recipient	$3,750
Friends of Animals	$3,750
Make a Wish	$3,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.9M · 50 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$86k

Still filing today

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationHealthInternationalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SI
STATEN ISLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +8%
ZS
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +23%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +50%

Funded once

FC
Fidelity Charitable Giftrust
one grant, 2022 · $75k
HA
HELPING ANIMALS LEFT ORPHANED INC
one grant, 2021 · $5k
BL
BISHOP LOUGHLIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
one grant, 2024 · $3k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals

Global Animal Partnership

Animals

Peace 4 Animals

Peace 4 animals animal welfare organization supports the conservation of endangered species worldwide. we work on campaigns to promote advocacy and education on how to protect wildlife in peril, as well as the preservation of their natural…

Animals

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals

Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals

Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoological Society of Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Lamancha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

31/32

Grantees still filing

19/32

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,708,490Animals$180,750Religion$72,000Education$41,000Human Services$35,300Philanthropy$25,000Environment$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY14.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stuart S Flamberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Stuart S Flamberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home