· Private foundation
The Strohm Link Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT - ROCKY MOUNTAIN | $50,000 |
| COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ESCUELA DE GUADALUPE | $20,000 |
| CHANCE SPORTS | $15,000 |
| DANIELS FUND | $11,592 |
| COLORADO BUSINESS HALL OF FAME | $10,000 |
| PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE | $7,500 |
| WELLSPRING COMMUNITY | $5,075 |
| TRINITY UNIVERSITY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $509k · revenue +27%
- WBWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT3× · 2021–2023 · $120k · revenue +7%
- CCCOE COLLEGE5× · 2017–2023 · $111k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF DEER TRAILone grant, 2020 · $39k
- CMColorado Museum of Natural Historyone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +1%
- CCROSSPURPOSEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +73%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.
To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity
The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…
To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Daniels Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Episcopal School Inc ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHANCE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DANIELS FUND ↗
- Who funds DOLLS FOR DAUGHTERS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds Cherry Creek Touchdown Club Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
- Who funds HORSESHOE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA COLORADO ↗
- Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION ↗
- Who funds IMPACT 100 METRO DENVER ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital ↗
- Who funds FOSTER TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 1 27 ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WOMEN'S EMPLOYMENT & EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Anschutz Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Ima Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Strohm Link Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.