Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Streisand Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
94
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Public Benefit$1.5MCivil Rights$1.1MEnvironment$977kPhilanthropy$733kArts & Culture$659kEducation$465kHealth$272kCrime & Legal$264kOther$0
02FY2024 · 94 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k55 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $227k
$12,500
Median grant
19
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES FOUNDATION$115,000
American Friends of the Hebrew University$56,972
THE CLINTON FOUNDATION$55,473
MOTHER JONES (Mother Jones CIR)$40,000
VOTE RIDERS$40,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$35,000
PROGRESS NOW$35,000
PRO PUBLICA$35,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$35,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$34,416
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$30,000
CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS$30,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$30,000
Network For Good$27,500
WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER$27,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $5k → 14%SHE ANGELS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $10k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $10k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $10k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $8k → 14%ALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $8k → 14%IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA: $7k → 17%IAVA: $7k → 17%IAVA: $7k → 17%IAVA: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 103 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

103 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
118

Total granted

$5.1M
$877k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEnvironmentInternationalHealthPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +59%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue ×13
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF OF 1000 OR LESS PER DONEE
    one grant, 2017 · $68k
  • UH
    UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $48k · revenue +34%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way and the most unlike its peers is Jerome Robbins Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…United Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Public Library OperationsJewish Community Organizati…Pregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/156
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,409

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

153 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 153 of the 256 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
148/153
Grantees still filing
96/153
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROGRESS NOW — $112,500 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $119,000 · Other+120 more — $2,829,775 · Other+120 moreCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $162,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR AMERICA…THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $140,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIP…INDIVISIBLE CIVICS — $132,500 · Civil RightsINDIVISIBLE CIVICSUltraViolet Education Fund — $105,000 · Civil RightsUltraViolet Educat…ROCK THE VOTE — $102,500 · Civil RightsROCK THE VOTEVET VOICE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsVET VOICE FOUNDATI…VOTERIDERS — $80,000 · Civil RightsVOTERIDERSCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND — $78,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA CALLS E…ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $72,500 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDATION OF…PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Civil Rights+5 more — $55,000 · Civil RightsNEW VENTURE FUND — $185,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FU…350ORG — $98,500 · Environment350ORGTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $97,500 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE F…LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $90,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONS…FRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $88,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE…ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $75,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $65,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOUR…NEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentNEXTGEN CLIMAT…CLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUITY FUND — $30,000 · Environment+6 more — $70,000 · Environment+6 moreTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $123,500 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMENS…THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC — $107,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERIC…THE GOOD INFORMATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GOOD I…THE 19TH NEWS — $57,500 · Arts & CultureTHE 19TH N…THE PAT CONROY LITERARY CENTER INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PAT CO…UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC — $48,000 · Arts & CultureUKRAINE HO…THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $37,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK…PRO PUBLICA INC — $35,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLIC…TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC — $22,500 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $65,500 · Arts & Culture+9 moreADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC — $145,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $120,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $56,972 · InternationalGlobal Impact — $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $25,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND — $20,000 · International+7 more — $47,500 · InternationalUCLA FOUNDATION — $114,416 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $91,500 · EducationRED WINE & BLUE EDUCATION FUND — $67,500 · EducationWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $54,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $49,500 · EducationVALUES UNITED — $20,000 · Education+3 more — $19,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $92,500 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $55,473 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $54,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $35,000 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $11,500 · Health+3 more — $18,500 · Health
Other$3,061,275Civil Rights$1,083,000Environment$849,000Arts & Culture$626,500International$439,472Education$415,916Health$266,973

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $162,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC — $145,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $140,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS — $132,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $123,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $120,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $119,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $114,416 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC — $107,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund — $105,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetROCK THE VOTE — $102,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetVET VOICE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budget350ORG — $98,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $97,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $92,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVerified Voting Foundation — $92,500 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $91,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH — $88,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVOTERIDERS — $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GOOD INFORMATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND — $78,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $72,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRED WINE & BLUE EDUCATION FUND — $67,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY — $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCONSUMER WATCHDOG — $61,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE 19TH NEWS — $57,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $56,972 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $56,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION — $55,473 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $54,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION — $52,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNEXTGEN CLIMATE AMERICA INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PAT CONROY LITERARY CENTER INC — $50,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $49,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC — $48,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE — $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $38,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $38,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INDIVISIBLE CIVICS ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN PROSPECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UltraViolet Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds ROCK THE VOTE ↗
  • Who funds VET VOICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Verified Voting Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds VOTERIDERS ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD INFORMATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds RED WINE & BLUE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…The San Francisco Fou…Hopewell FundCalifornia Community …Tides FoundationImpactassetsincMarin Community Found…New Venture FundThe Annenberg Foundat…Wallace Global Fund IISilicon Valley Commun…Park Foundation Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC30.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Hopewell Fund · California Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Marin Community Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Annenberg Foundation · Wallace Global Fund II · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Park Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Streisand Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Streisand Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Streisand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 256 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines