· Private foundation
The Stephen & Renee Bisciotti Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $557k
- $50k–250k28 grants · $3.0M
- $250k+23 grants · $38M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC | $8,000,000 |
| FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC | $5,000,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INCORPORATED | $3,000,000 |
| BLACKBIRD LABORATORIES INC | $2,973,000 |
| BLACKBIRD LABORATORIES INC | $2,718,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INCORPORATED | $2,600,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE INCORPORATED | $2,400,000 |
| BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $2,000,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY INC | $2,000,000 |
| BLACKBIRD LABORATORIES INC | $1,860,000 |
| BRIDGES BALTIMORE INC | $900,000 |
| COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION INC | $900,000 |
| BLACKBIRD LABORATORIES INC | $832,000 |
| IRC'S CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC | $650,000 |
| COLLEGE TRACK | $450,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $29.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of The Stephen & Renee Bisciotti Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC6× · 2019–2024 · $28M · revenue +23%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY6× · 2019–2024 · $14M · revenue +369%
- TBTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE3× · 2022–2024 · $13M · revenue +150% · 40% of their budget
Funded once
- TFTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDone grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue -58% · 27% of their budget
- TDTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue -83%
- TATHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
The baltimore educational scholarship trust, in partnership with our seventeen independent member schools, recruits and supports through the admissions process academically ambitious, african american students with financial need from the…
To raise and manage funds and to provide financial support to the university of baltimore. the foundation provides leadership, guidance, and support to the university's administration in advancing the mission and vision of the university.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Baltimore children & youth fund stewards public funds to support children and youth in baltimore city. the fund awards grants to community-based, youth-serving organizations and provides capacity-building and technical assistance to…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Serving the interests of independent higher education and supporting the work of campus leaders throughout the state of maryland.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The cfa society baltimore, inc. was founded in 1948. the cfa society baltimore, inc. was established to provide the financial community with information and knowledge, while advocating ethical conduct with regard to investments and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family League of Baltimore City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKBIRD LABORATORIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds TROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds IRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ANNAPOLIS & ANNE ARUNDEL ↗
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds FANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COPPIN STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds VEHICLES FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stephen & Renee Bisciotti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- Talisman Therapeutic Riding Inc — 25% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Turnaround Inc — 18% of income from government
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Everyman Theatre Inc — 15% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc — 10% of income from government
- American Communities Trust — 9% of income from government
- Maryland New Directions Inc — 8% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Morgan State University Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore — 2% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goucher College — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.