Skip to content
The Sobrato Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Sobrato Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69M
Granted FY2024still arriving
526
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$208MEducation$45MHuman Services$25MCommunity Improvement$17MHousing & Shelter$13MHealth$13MEmployment$10.0MCivil Rights$8.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 526 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k146 grants · $239k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $921k
  • $50k–250k282 grants · $32M
  • $250k+61 grants · $36M
$75,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$886M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$3,000,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$1,500,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO$1,000,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$1,000,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
GLOBAL IMPACT$875,000
DESTINATION HOME$660,000
SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES$500,000
ABODE SERVICES$500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $25.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAST: $350k → 10%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $220k → 10%CAST: $250k → 10%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $175k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE BAY AREA: $165k → 19%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $231k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $220k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $210k → 8%GOLDEN STATE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%GOLDEN STATE OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $188k → 10%GOLDEN STATE OPPORTUNITY: $175k → 10%MERIT AMERICA: $178k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $178k → 14%KIDANGO INC: $250k → 10%KIDANGO INC: $175k → 10%KIDANGO INC: $175k → 10%BAY AREA COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $200k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $175k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $175k → 10%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $220k → 10%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $200k → 10%WORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $200k → 10%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT: $250k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT: $250k → 8%AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT: $243k → 8%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SOAR: $400k → 7%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SOAR: $250k → 7%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SOAR: $250k → 7%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK: $185k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $170k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $170k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $165k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $250k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $236k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $230k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $225k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $189k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $220k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $225k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $263k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $263k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $250k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $250k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $250k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of The Sobrato Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 91%.

The Sobrato Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147M · 308 repeat orgs$79M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

308 repeat relationships: 254 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 118 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

308
185

Total granted

$147M
$72M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+4%

Still filing today

88%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ABODE SERVICES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +131%
  • SM
    SOMOS MAYFAIR INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +34%
  • The Education Trust Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Sobrato Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $58M · revenue -91% · 43% of their budget
  • CI
    Catalytic Impact Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $2.5M · revenue -73% · 61% of their budget
  • GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
7
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
8
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
9
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
10
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
11
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
12
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Redwood City Mandarin Immersion Scholars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

534 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 534 of the 649 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
81
Early backer (in before they grew)
529/534
Grantees still filing
323/534
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $115,110,522 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationThe Sobrato Foundation: $58,000,000 · PhilanthropyThe Sobrato FoundationIMPACTASSETSINC: $15,290,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSETSINC+12 more: $13,146,923 · Philanthropy+12 moreDESTINATION HOME: $2,710,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND: $4,785,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND+80 more: $60,829,661 · Other+80 moreCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER: $3,090,000 · EducationCALIFORNI…The Education Trust Inc: $1,750,000 · EducationThe Educa…LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $1,565,000 · EducationLATINO EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $1,561,500 · EducationYEAR UP INC: $1,350,000 · EducationACE CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,160,000 · EducationCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $1,075,000 · EducationKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $1,075,000 · EducationTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 · Education+27 more: $16,148,355 · Education+27 moreAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $1,434,400 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,416,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $1,365,650 · Human ServicesALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $1,203,000 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1,187,070 · Human ServicesWORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $1,115,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 · Human ServicesBILL WILSON CENTER: $922,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW: $850,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $813,850 · Human ServicesKidango Inc: $800,000 · Human Services+21 more: $10,382,698 · Human ServicesSOMOS MAYFAIR INC: $1,818,924 · Community ImprovementRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $1,320,000 · Community ImprovementSMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,225,000 · Community ImprovementGRAMEEN AMERICA INC: $1,195,000 · Community ImprovementABLE WORKS: $745,000 · Community ImprovementICAFUND: $641,150 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $630,650 · Community ImprovementCentro Community Partners: $625,000 · Community ImprovementSFMade Inc: $615,000 · Community ImprovementVEGGIELUTION: $585,250 · Community ImprovementMISSION ASSET FUND: $512,500 · Community ImprovementPartnership for Children & Youth: $497,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN NONPROFITS: $465,000 · Community ImprovementThrive Alliance Thrive - The Alliance of Nonprofits: $440,650 · Community Improvement+3 more: $875,000 · Community ImprovementSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $1,490,000 · HealthGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $1,036,000 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $1,014,569 · HealthTIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC: $995,500 · HealthTHE HEALTH TRUST: $768,650 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $517,000 · HealthHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $454,125 · HealthWorking Partnerships USA: $450,000 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $429,875 · HealthON-SITE DENTAL CARE FOUNDATION INC: $304,750 · HealthBRAVEN INC: $1,496,000 · Youth DevelopmentCalifornians Dedicated to Education Foundation: $1,305,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $1,185,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $1,020,209 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT SENTINEL INC: $629,500 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL: $602,500 · Youth DevelopmentELEVATE TUTORING INC: $455,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SILICON VALLEY: $450,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$201,547,445Other$68,324,661Education$29,774,855Human Services$22,514,668Community Improvement$12,191,124Health$7,460,469Youth Development$7,143,209

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $115,110,522 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetThe Sobrato Foundation: $58,000,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC: $15,290,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $4,785,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER: $3,090,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $3,002,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetCatalytic Impact Foundation Inc: $2,500,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetGRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES: $2,015,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $1,910,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSOMOS MAYFAIR INC: $1,818,924 over 5y, 17% of budgetCalifornians For Justice Education Fund: $1,790,500 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $1,750,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR BILINGUAL EDUCATION: $1,685,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $1,565,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $1,561,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetPARENT INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $1,554,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetBRAVEN INC: $1,496,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $1,490,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND ENPOWERMENT: $1,434,400 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,416,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $1,410,900 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSAFE SPACE PICTURES FOUNDATION: $1,400,000 over 3y, 66% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,377,733 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $1,365,650 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $1,350,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $1,320,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCalifornians Dedicated to Education Foundation: $1,305,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc: $1,296,750 over 5y, 11% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $1,290,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,250,668 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUMA VENTURES INC: $1,225,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,225,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,225,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $1,222,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $1,203,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $1,203,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC: $1,195,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,190,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1,187,070 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $1,185,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetACE CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,160,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWORKING SOLUTIONS CDFI: $1,115,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA: $1,109,450 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR HISPANIC EDUCATION: $1,100,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCRISTO REY SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL: $1,075,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $1,075,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBuilding Skills Partnership: $1,070,300 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $1,065,600 over 5y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile …Sunlight GivingThe Heising-Simons Fo…United Way of the Bay…Atkinson FoundationSan Jose Mercury News…Destination Home SV c…Sand Hill FoundationPhilanthropic Venture…Los Altos Mountain Vi…Second Harvest of Sil…The Palo Alto Communi…
The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA128× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Sunlight Giving · The Heising-Simons Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Atkinson Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Palo Alto Community Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sobrato Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sobrato Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Cast Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Uaspire Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
96report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 649 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sobrato Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home