Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Smith Children Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$89kCivil Rights$24kFood & Nutrition$21kAnimals$19kHousing & Shelter$16kHuman Services$15kReligion$14kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$703k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWEST OHIO$10,000
NEIGHBORS OPPOSING PIT EXPANSION$7,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO CINCINNATI$4,000
BETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE$3,000
GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY$3,000
URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM$2,500
NC WARN$2,000
A SPECIAL BLEND$2,000
PARTNERS ON HEALTH$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
PAWS4EVER$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBORO$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
HABAT JEWISH CENTER OF GREENSBORO$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 16%GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 18 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
10

Total granted

$214k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+66%

Still filing today

61%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Urban Ministries of Durham Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +35%
  • Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +4%
  • NC WARN INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NW
    NC Warn
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BS
    Bnai Shalom Day School
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SF
    SECU Family House AT UNC Hospitals
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners for Environmental Justice

The mission of pej is to promote understanding and protection of urban wetlands, enhance community pride, and encourage economic development.

Environment
2
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
3
Porch-Durham

PORCH-Durham works in partnership with a variety of Durham county nonprofit and community based organizations to identify children and families most at risk of hunger. We provide shelf-stable foods from our monthly neighborhood food…

Food & Nutrition
4
Environmental Justice Community Action Network

NC has clean & safe air, water & soil.

Environment
5
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
6
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
7
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
8
West End Revitalization Association

Support access to basic public health amenities safe drinking water sewer lines housing streets sidewalks and storm-water management for primarily African American and Native American heritage communities: West End White Level Kimrey Road…

Community Improvement
9
Asheville GreenWorks

Asheville GreenWorks inspires, equips and mobilizes communities to create an equitable climate-resilient future.

—
10
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
11
Share-Ws Inc

Winston-salem, nc, the principal city in forsyth county, has multiple "food deserts,- or residential areas where there are no full-service grocery stores, offering produce and other fresh foods, within a radius of one mile. these "food…

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nc Warn Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Civil Liberties Union: $23,520 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties UnionUrban Ministries of Durham Inc: $16,020 · OtherUrban Ministries of Durham IncCincinnati Zoo: $14,000 · OtherCincinnati ZooCATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWEST OHIO: $10,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWEST OHIOJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $7,000 · OtherJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATIONBETH DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $5,500 · OtherB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC: $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO CINCINNATI: $4,000 · Other+15 more: $20,940 · Other+15 moreNEIGHBORS OPPOSING PIT EXPANSION: $59,500 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORS OPPOSING PIT EXPANSIONNC WARN INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentNC WARN INCROGER'S EUBANKS NEIGHBORHOOD: $9,000 · EnvironmentROGER'S EUBANKS NEIGHBORHOODAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $6,000 · EnvironmentAPPALACHIAN VOICES+1 more: $520 · EnvironmentMeals on Wheels of Durham Inc: $14,700 · Food & NutritionMeals on …PORCH INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionPORCH INCLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $13,500 · Human ServicesGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $3,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,000 · InternationalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 · AnimalsA SPECIAL BLEND INC: $2,000 · Employment
Other$105,980Environment$89,020Food & Nutrition$20,700Human Services$16,500International$7,000Health$5,000Animals$4,000Employment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORS OPPOSING PIT EXPANSION: $59,500 over 4y, 26% of budgetUrban Ministries of Durham Inc: $16,020 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Durham Inc: $14,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNC WARN INC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROGER'S EUBANKS NEIGHBORHOOD: $9,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH INC: $6,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SPECIAL BLEND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEIGHBORS OPPOSING PIT EXPANSION ↗
  • Who funds Urban Ministries of Durham Inc ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc ↗
  • Who funds NC WARN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ROGER'S EUBANKS NEIGHBORHOOD ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PORCH INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN VOICES ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI SHALOM SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds A SPECIAL BLEND INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leon Levine FoundationNC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Smith Children Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Smith Children Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Smith Children Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Smith Children Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smith Children Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph