Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sidwell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$290kHuman Services$185kHealth$137kHousing & Shelter$126kEducation$114kInternational$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kCivil Rights$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$941k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$25,000
AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
LAURA BUSH INSTITUTE$5,000
HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK$5,000
TURN CENTER$4,000
HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC$4,000
EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE$4,000
THE BRIDGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY$3,000
DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER$3,000
CITADELLE ART FOUNDATION$2,000
PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER$2,000
OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 9%THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 11%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $25k → 17%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 9%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $3k → 9%HOPE FARM INC: $30k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $2k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
MO
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$654k · 25 repeat orgs$564k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
43

Total granted

$654k
$533k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+15%

Still filing today

52%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $82k · revenue +134%
  • DT
    Dallas Theological Seminary
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +81%
  • HF
    HOPE FARM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +158%

Funded once

  • EM
    East-West Ministries International
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • WC
    WARREN CULWELL MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -14% · 26% of their budget
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITAT
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hendrick Home for Children
—
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
5
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

—
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
Refuge City

Refuge city provides safe places for children in dallas / ft. worth (dfw) who have been sex trafficked or sexually exploited to achieve restoration, education, and reintegration in a family-focused environment through the love of jesus…

Human Services
8
Fort Worth Christain School Inc

Fort worth christian school is a christ-centered community where every child is loved, valued, taught excellence in and out of the classroom, and empowered by a biblical worldview for a lifetime of faith and service.

Education
9
Mission Travis Mercy

Mercy clinic exists to show christ's love and compassion by providing free health care, spiritual care, and assistance in self-help to the underserved population in tarrant county, texas.

Health
10
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
11
Criswell College

The mission of criswell college is to provide ministerial and professional higher education for men and women preparing to serve as christian leaders throughout society, while maintaining an institutional commitment to biblical inerrancy.

Education
12
Trinity School of Midland Texas

The mission of trinity school is to be a college preparatory community that provides a nurturing environment to enrich the mind, strengthen the body, enliven the soul, and inspire servant leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hope and Healing Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Citadelle Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COU: $84,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUCHRIST CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCH: $61,500 · OtherCHRIST CHAPEL BIBLE CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $57,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITAT: $35,000 · OtherCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $34,000 · OtherNEEDS COUNCIL: $30,000 · OtherTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $28,000 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $28,000 · OtherPIONEERS: $25,000 · OtherMIAMI VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25,000 · Other+42 more: $291,711 · Other+42 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $82,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURS…East-West Ministries International: $50,000 · ReligionEast-West Minist…WARREN CULWELL MINISTRY INC: $50,000 · ReligionWARREN CULWELL M…HOPE FARM INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM I…PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $32,500 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIA…Good Samaritan Christian Services Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesGood Samari…EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $21,000 · Human ServicesEVELINE'S S…CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'…+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesDallas Theological Seminary: $60,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $25,000 · HealthHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $21,000 · HealthFORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,000 · HealthTHE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC: $6,500 · HealthTURN CENTER: $4,000 · HealthTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$699,211Religion$182,000Human Services$123,500Education$77,000Health$76,500Housing & Shelter$30,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $82,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN CULWELL MINISTRY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $32,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $32,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $21,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCitadelle Art Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HOPE AND HEALING PLACE INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTURN CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds WARREN CULWELL MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMARILLO COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Good Samaritan Christian Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE CITY FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mays FoundationTX30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mays Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Bradley Family Charitable Trust · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sidwell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sidwell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sidwell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sidwell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sidwell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph