Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sheth Sangreal Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Animals$33MYouth Development$9.4MArts & Culture$6.5MInternational$3.1MEducation$1.5MHuman Services$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.2MEnvironment$657kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $438k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$137,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE AUSTIN A$1,000,000
DISCOVERY MUSEUM$200,000
NCEAS$137,500
THE ENTERTIANMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATI$100,000
GAZELLE FOUNDATION$25,000
ANGUILLA PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION OF$21,860
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $850k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIONS CLUB OF PEARLAND: $100k → 10%Austin Area Urban League: $750k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51M · 15 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
27

Total granted

$51M
$6.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+2%

Still filing today

60%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • REWILD
    5× · 2018–2022 · $33M · revenue +236% · 70% of their budget
  • MW
    MAASAI WILDERNESS CONSERVATION FUND
    3× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +0% · 36% of their budget
  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $670k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • GP
    GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.7M · revenue -51%
  • AA
    Austin Area Urban League
    one grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +5%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $556k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

—
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Arc Prize Foundation

The arc prize foundation advances progress toward artificial general intelligence (agi) by creating public benchmarks, running competitions,and fostering a global research community. we educate students, researchers, and the broader public…

—
5
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
6
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals
9
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
10
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
11
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
12
Alliant Educational Foundation

The alliant educational foundation builds bridges between under-resourced communities, universities, and other organizations to create a more equitable, healthy, and just society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the most unlike its peers is KIDZ1STFUND Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Community FoundationsVeteran Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentChristian Missionary Organi…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Fallen First Responder Supp…Education Equity LeadershipCancer Support OrganizationsSmall Business Development …Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%15%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr13%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,772

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
19/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REWILD — $32,517,969 · AnimalsREWILD+3 more — $949,361 · AnimalsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE AUSTIN A — $9,150,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE AUSTIN …THE GRAMMY FOUNDATION — $4,846,444 · OtherTHE GRAMMY FOUNDATION+24 more — $3,652,608 · Other+24 moreGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC — $1,700,000 · Social ScienceDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC — $800,000 · Arts & CultureCICERO RESEARCH — $500,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $100,000 · Arts & CultureLULU & LEO FUND — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION — $670,000 · EducationSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $225,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $150,000 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH — $50,000 · EducationKATELLE FOUNDATION INC — $49,341 · Education+1 more — $25,000 · EducationMAASAI WILDERNESS CONSERVATION FUND — $1,133,354 · InternationalAustin Area Urban League — $750,000 · Human ServicesLions Club of Pearland Inc — $100,000 · Human Services
Animals$33,467,330Other$17,649,052Social Science$1,700,000Arts & Culture$1,470,000Education$1,169,341International$1,133,354Human Services$850,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREWILD — $32,517,969 over 5y, 70% of budgetGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC — $1,700,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMAASAI WILDERNESS CONSERVATION FUND — $1,133,354 over 3y, 36% of budgetDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC — $800,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetAustin Area Urban League — $750,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION — $670,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $560,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCICERO RESEARCH — $500,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $500,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $399,361 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $225,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetANGUILLA INITIATIVE — $206,434 over 1y, 49% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIDZ1STFUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLULU & LEO FUND — $60,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetLIVE OCEAN — $57,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBONESHAKER PROJECT — $50,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetKATELLE FOUNDATION INC — $49,341 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS — $35,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGazelle Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE ARMORY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANDREW S RODDICK FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHAREWELL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN COPS FOR CHARITIES — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Pwc Foundation IncCharities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bessemer Giving F…Vanguard Charitable E…California Community …National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…
Austin Community Foundation IncTX18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sheth Sangreal Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines