Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

BONESHAKER PROJECT

BONESHAKER PROJECT (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $97,354 to it, the largest being The Sheth Sangreal Foundation ($50,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$26k
Revenue FY2021
6
Funders on record
$97k
Grants received
$-25371
Net assets
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 85%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($200k) Expenses 100 ($252k)2018 Revenue 10 ($21k) Expenses 14 ($36k)2019 Revenue 25 ($50k) Expenses 10 ($25k)2020 Revenue 23 ($47k) Expenses 23 ($57k)2021 Revenue 13 ($26k) Expenses 13 ($32k)
20172018201920202021
Revenue (13)Expenses (13)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$51k
17
$15k
18
$25k
19
$10k
20
$6k
21
0.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $10k → $16.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BONESHAKER PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BONESHAKER PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BONESHAKER PROJECT.

51%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 100% · 2019 64% · 2020 80% · 2021 55% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of BONESHAKER PROJECT's grant income comes from Texas funders.

WY
CT
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
20
21
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $47k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BONESHAKER PROJECT

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BONESHAKER PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BONESHAKER PROJECT?
BONESHAKER PROJECT (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $97,354 to it, the largest being The Sheth Sangreal Foundation ($50,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BONESHAKER PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $97,354 in grants to BONESHAKER PROJECT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BONESHAKER PROJECT?
The Sheth Sangreal Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BONESHAKER PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2017–2021), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing