Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sharrock Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$42kArts & Culture$31kEnvironment$23kFood & Nutrition$17kHuman Services$15kHealth$14kReligion$9kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$800
Median grant
4
States reached
$361k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION$4,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH KATONAH$3,500
KATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY$3,000
MADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$2,000
PELHAM ART CENTER INC$2,000
CITY HARVEST$2,000
OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND$2,000
HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$1,850
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$1,831
THE PICTURE HOUSE REGIONAL FILM CENTER$1,250
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC$1,000
SPENCE SCHOOL$1,000
CARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
BARTOW PELL LANDMARK FUND$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 12%MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 12%MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 12%MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 29 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$158k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-28%

Still filing today

66%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +26%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +52%
  • ML
    MADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST
    7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • WL
    Westchester Land Trust Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -28%
  • ES
    EC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -37%
  • T
    THIRTEEN
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations

The mission of the new york public library is to inspire lifelong learning, advance knowledge, and strengthen our communities.

Education
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
10
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
The Queens Borough Public Library

Queens library transforms lives by cultivating personal and intellectual growth and by building strong communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARYTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7,500 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY92ND ST Y: $7,000 · Other92ND ST YMADISON AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5,500 · OtherMADISON AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHESSEX ART ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,000 · OtherNORTH MADISON VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $3,500 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH KATONAH: $3,500 · OtherMADISON ART SOCIETY: $3,400 · OtherGUILFORD ART LEAGUE: $3,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherCLINTON ART SOCIETY: $3,000 · OtherCARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $8,000 · OtherCARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 · Other+9 more: $12,400 · Other+9 moreTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $9,750 · EducationTHE OAKLAND …THE SPENCE SCHOOL: $4,800 · EducationTHE SPENCE S…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3,581 · EducationWESLEYAN UNI…+2 more: $1,100 · Education+2 moreMADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $12,000 · EnvironmentMADISON LAND…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESO…Westchester Land Trust Inc: $1,500 · EnvironmentWestchester …LEWISBORO LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentCITY HARVEST INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVE…HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $1,850 · Food & NutritionHOPE COMMU…MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesMADISON C…PELHAM ART CENTER INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PICTURE HOUSE REGIONAL FILM CENTER INC: $1,250 · Arts & CultureBARTOW PELL LANDMARK FUND: $800 · Arts & CultureHUDSON VALLEY LOCAL NEWS LAB INC: $600 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $150 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 · HealthPush for Empowered Pregnancy Inc: $2,100 · Health
Other$85,550Education$19,231Environment$19,000Food & Nutrition$16,850Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$10,800Health$10,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $12,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $9,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPELHAM ART CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $4,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX ART ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3,581 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDENS BRIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPush for Empowered Pregnancy Inc: $2,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $2,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $1,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWISBORO LAND TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBARTOW PELL LANDMARK FUND: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PELHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST HARTFORD ART LEAGUE INC: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MADISON COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON LAND CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CARL SCHURZ PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds PELHAM ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX ART ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDENS BRIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Push for Empowered Pregnancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PICTURE HOUSE REGIONAL FILM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EC SCRANTON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LEWISBORO LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTOW PELL LANDMARK FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON VALLEY LOCAL NEWS LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PELHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sharrock Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sharrock Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Madison Land Conservation Trust: 68% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sharrock Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph