Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sharp Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$245kHealth$244kFood & Nutrition$167kArts & Culture$68kPhilanthropy$60kEducation$44kYouth Development$37kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE$20,000
BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION$20,000
COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $8k → 7%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $20k → 8%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $5k → 7%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $20k → 8%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $5k → 7%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $15k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $15k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $15k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $10k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $10k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION NFP: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$802k · 18 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$802k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+36%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $155k · revenue +40%
  • IZ
    Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $45k · revenue +85%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $38k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SH
    SOUTHPORT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • DT
    DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +104%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIOINALS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

2
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
3
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
7
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

10
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bryan Area Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Williams County Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE LEGACY FOUNDATION OF SHELL POIN — $125,100 · OtherTHE LEGACY FOUNDATION OF SHELL POINPHEASANTS FOREVER — $60,000 · OtherPHEASANTS FOREVERDAVIS ARTS CENTER — $43,000 · OtherDAVIS ARTS CENTERLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · OtherLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCSIDNEY & BERNE DAVIS ART CENTER — $25,000 · OtherSIDNEY & BERNE DAVIS ART CENTERSOUTHPORT HIGH SCHOOL — $25,000 · OtherSOUTHPORT HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherWILLIAMS COUNTY SPORTSMANS EDUCATIO — $20,000 · Other+15 more — $94,000 · Other+15 moreCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $154,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INCEquestrian Connection NFP — $110,000 · Human ServicesEquestrian Connection NFPFamily Shelter Service Inc — $17,500 · Human ServicesFamily Shelter Service IncBRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · PhilanthropyIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $45,000 · AnimalsPEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $5,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC — $37,500 · HealthUlta Beauty Charitable Foundation — $16,000 · HealthHEART HAVEN OUTREACH — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUniversity of Indianapolis — $7,500 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Education
Other$449,600Human Services$282,000Philanthropy$60,000Animals$55,000Health$53,500Youth Development$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$28,000Education$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $154,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP — $110,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC — $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHEART HAVEN OUTREACH — $35,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Shelter Service Inc — $17,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $14,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC
  • Who funds Equestrian Connection NFP
  • Who funds BRYAN AREA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS INC
  • Who funds HEART HAVEN OUTREACH
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Family Shelter Service Inc
  • Who funds Ulta Beauty Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds WILLIAMS COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION
  • Who funds Bolingbrook Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds University of Indianapolis
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL9.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sharp Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sharp Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Sharp Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph