Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sexauer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$435k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$949kHealth$404kEducation$230kYouth Development$229kHousing & Shelter$120kReligion$111kCivil Rights$90kFood & Nutrition$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $415k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAROLINE HOUSE$30,000
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SVC$30,000
HOMES WITH HOPE$27,500
HOSPICE OF WESTCHESTER$25,000
EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL$25,000
FIRST STEPS$25,000
THE SCOTTY FUND$25,000
KIDS IN CRISIS$25,000
ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP$25,000
ARNETTE HOUSE$25,000
HOPES DOOR$20,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS$20,000
SLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $401k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARNETTE HOUSE: $65k → 16%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $40k → 9%ARNETTE HOUSE: $25k → 16%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $30k → 9%ARNETTE HOUSE: $25k → 16%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $30k → 9%ARNETTE HOUSE: $25k → 16%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $20k → 9%ARNETTE HOUSE: $25k → 16%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $14k → 9%HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST: $23k → 16%THE REGIONAL YMCA OF WESTERN CT: $10k → 9%HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST: $18k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST: $18k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST: $13k → 16%HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST: $13k → 16%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
SC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 29 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$2.1M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+30%

Still filing today

76%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KI
    KIDS IN CRISIS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $179k · revenue +67%
  • AH
    ARNETTE HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +50%
  • MT
    Marion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $164k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • CH
    CAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +3% · 38% of their budget
  • RY
    REGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
2
The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…

Human Services
3
Hunger Solutions New York Inc

We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…

Food & Nutrition
4
Families Together in New York State Inc

Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.

Human Services
5
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
6
Erie Homes for Children & Adults Inc

Erie homes for children and adults operates as a private, non-profit agency providing programs for individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities.

Health
7
Home Care Association of New York State Inc

To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.

Community Improvement
8
Westchester Institute for Human Development

The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…

Health
9
The Home for Little Wanderers Inc

To help vulnerable children and their families build permanent, positive change.

Human Services
10
Family Ties of Westchester Inc

Through the power of peer-led support, education and advocacy, family ties builds resilience and ignites hope in families living in westchester county experiencing trauma, behavioral health needs and other systemic challenges.

Human Services
11
Apropos Housing Opportunities and Mgmt Enterprises Inc

A-home is a not-for-profit organization that strengthens northern westchester neighborhoods by providing residents a safe and affordable place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Children's Center of New Paltz Inc

Operate and maintain a day care center for children of students, faculty, and staff of the state university of new york at new paltz, and for children of the greater new paltz community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Children's Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Partnership for After School Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIDS IN CRISIS INC: $179,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INCMarion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc: $164,000 · OtherMarion Therapeutic Riding Association IncCAROLINE HOUSE INC: $105,000 · OtherCAROLINE HOUSE INCHOMES WITH HOPE: $100,000 · OtherHOMES WITH HOPEOSSINING UNION FREE SD FIRST STEPS PROGR: $90,000 · OtherOSSINING UNION FREE SD FIRST STEPS PROGRHOPES DOOR INC: $87,000 · OtherHOPES DOOR INCFRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENT: $61,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENTFIRST STEPS: $50,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARS: $36,750 · Other+19 more: $214,000 · Other+19 moreARNETTE HOUSE INC: $165,000 · Human ServicesARNETTE HOUSE INCCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $133,750 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCH…THE SCOTTY FUND INC LINDA ANDERSON: $120,000 · Human ServicesTHE SCOTTY FUND INC LINDA AN…HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC: $82,500 · Human ServicesHELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST IN…Homes With Hope Inc: $62,500 · Human ServicesHomes With Hope Inc+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $150,000 · HealthWESTCHESTER JE…QUANTUM HOUSE INC: $110,000 · HealthQUANTUM HOUSE …ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $25,000 · HealthENDEAVOR THERA…EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $125,000 · EducationEQUALITY …THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $50,000 · EducationTHE BRIDG…+3 more: $9,000 · EducationTHE ELM PROJECT: $57,500 · Youth DevelopmentSLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentEdventure Inc: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATION: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,087,250Human Services$583,750Health$285,000Education$184,000Youth Development$92,500Arts & Culture$40,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $179,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetARNETTE HOUSE INC: $165,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetMarion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc: $164,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $133,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SCOTTY FUND INC LINDA ANDERSON: $120,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetQUANTUM HOUSE INC: $110,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCAROLINE HOUSE INC: $105,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetHOMES WITH HOPE: $100,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC: $87,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC: $82,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHomes With Hope Inc: $62,500 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetTHE ELM PROJECT: $57,500 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEdventure Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTCHESTER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARNETTE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Marion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SCOTTY FUND INC LINDA ANDERSON ↗
  • Who funds QUANTUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC ↗
  • Who funds Homes With Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Edventure Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Charitable FoundationME16.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Impact100 Westchester Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sexauer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sexauer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Homes With Hope: 28% of income from government
  • Arnette House Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Marion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sexauer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sexauer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sexauer’s filings →

More from the funding graph