· Private foundation
The Sexauer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $415k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAROLINE HOUSE | $30,000 |
| WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SVC | $30,000 |
| HOMES WITH HOPE | $27,500 |
| EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| ARNETTE HOUSE | $25,000 |
| ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP | $25,000 |
| FIRST STEPS | $25,000 |
| THE SCOTTY FUND | $25,000 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS | $25,000 |
| HOSPICE OF WESTCHESTER | $25,000 |
| CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER | $20,000 |
| FRANCISCAN FRIARS | $20,000 |
| HOPES DOOR | $20,000 |
| SLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $401k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KIKIDS IN CRISIS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $179k · revenue +67%
- AHARNETTE HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +50%
- MTMarion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $164k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- HAHOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OFone grant, 2022 · $30k
- CHCAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +3% · 38% of their budget
- RYREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.
To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
Establish a unified voice for children and youth with emotional, behavioral, and social challenges. the organizational mission is to ensure that every family has access to needed information, support, and services.
Children's services
Erie homes for children and adults operates as a private, non-profit agency providing programs for individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities.
To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.
The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…
To help vulnerable children and their families build permanent, positive change.
Through the power of peer-led support, education and advocacy, family ties builds resilience and ignites hope in families living in westchester county experiencing trauma, behavioral health needs and other systemic challenges.
A-home is a not-for-profit organization that strengthens northern westchester neighborhoods by providing residents a safe and affordable place to live.
Operate and maintain a day care center for children of students, faculty, and staff of the state university of new york at new paltz, and for children of the greater new paltz community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Children's Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Partnership for After School Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds ARNETTE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Marion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE SCOTTY FUND INC LINDA ANDERSON ↗
- Who funds QUANTUM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CAROLINE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE ↗
- Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds HELP AGENCY OF THE FOREST INC ↗
- Who funds Homes With Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Edventure Inc ↗
- Who funds SLATER FAMILY NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CAROLINE HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOR AFTER SCHOOL EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Impact100 Westchester Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sexauer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Homes With Hope — 28% of income from government
- Arnette House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Marion Therapeutic Riding Association Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Sexauer Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sexauer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.