· Private foundation
The Schultz Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k39 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
Anchored by a single position — about 97% of reported assets are held in Bank Of America 4007.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DANIEL | $100,000 |
| UNF FOUNDATION INC | $21,500 |
| FROM THE HEART PRODUCTION | $20,000 |
| PAIDEIA SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| EARTH JUSTICE LEGAL DEFENSE FUND | $10,000 |
| LEJA BULELA INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER | $5,000 |
| BEACHES FINE ART SERIES | $5,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $5,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS | $5,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS | $5,000 |
| HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
80 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PAIDEIA SCHOOL INC4× · 2019–2024 · $70k · revenue +17%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $43k · revenue +42%
- JUJacksonville University3× · 2019–2023 · $25k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- SVST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $26k · revenue -17%
- PUPrinceton University Art Museumone grant, 2019 · $10k
- TBThe Bolles Schoolone grant, 2019 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…
The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Jacksonville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Murray Hill Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PAIDEIA SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHULTZ CENTER FOR TEACHING AND ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
- Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds BEACHES FINE ARTS SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE AREA LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds The Jacksonville Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA DEFENDERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Haskell Foundation · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Dubow Family Foundation Inc · National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · VyStar Credit Union · Winston Family Foundation · The Thomas M and Irene Kirbo Charitable Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Schultz Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
- Jacksonville Area Legal Aid Inc — 13% of income from government
- Operation New Hope Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Gateway Community Services Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Jacksonville University — 3% of income from government
- Groundwork Jacksonville Inc — 3% of income from government
- Downtown Vision Inc — 1% of income from government
- Clara White Mission Inc — 1% of income from government
- Leadership Jacksonville Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Schultz Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Schultz Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.