· Private foundation
National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k17 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $286k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FAMILY INS DREAMS FDTN | $210,608 |
| YOUR CAUSE | $75,201 |
| PINE CASTLE INC | $16,411 |
| FHS PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| ONE TREE PLANTED INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| SHEPHERD | $7,997 |
| MOCO ARTS | $5,000 |
| BEACHES HONOR GUARD | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| GENERATION W INC | $5,000 |
| MONADNOCK UNITED WAY | $5,000 |
| CUMMER MUSEUM OF ARTS & GARDEN | $5,000 |
| GLAD TO BE HERE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LET IT SHINE | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
88 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 76 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $268k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc5× · 2019–2023 · $199k · revenue +43%
- PCPINE CASTLE INC4× · 2019–2023 · $43k · revenue +33%
- TMTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER5× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TTAPSone grant, 2019 · $25k
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -6%- MCMAKING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CHARTEone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Glad to Be Here Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
231 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 231 of the 346 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds PINE CASTLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLONIAL THEATRE ↗
- Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FLORIDA THEATRE PERFORMING ARTS CENT ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MONADNOCK COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE CLARENCE DEMAR MARATHON INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE AVONDALE PRESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CLARA WHITE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Museum of Science and History of Jacksonville Inc ↗
- Who funds IM SULZBACHER CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING TINY TUMMIES ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds DE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Glad To Be Here Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ANNIERUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · The Doerr Foundation Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · VyStar Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Advocates Inc — 66% of income from government
- Springfield Day Nursery Corporation — 61% of income from government
- Historic Annapolis Inc — 45% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
- Im Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless Inc — 23% of income from government
- Central Connecticut Coast Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Jacksonville Area Legal Aid Inc — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc — 1% of income from government
- Clara White Mission Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Leadership Jacksonville Inc — 0% of income from government
- Stonehill College Inc — 0% of income from government
- Generation W Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pine Castle Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to National Grange Mutual Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.