· Private foundation
The Roller-Bottimore Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $545k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMORY & HENRY UNIVERSITY | $84,500 |
| SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| NATIONAL SOC OF COLONIAL DAMES OF VA | $75,000 |
| BRANCH MUSEUM OF DESIGN | $75,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HOLLYWOOD CEMETERY | $75,000 |
| MEMORIAL FDN OF THE GERMANNA | $60,000 |
| THE MENOKIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| LYRIC COUNCIL INC | $50,000 |
| VENTURE RICHMOND INC | $25,000 |
| MARINERS' MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION | $23,000 |
| WILLIAM & MARY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC CHRIST CHURCH | $20,000 |
| VIRGINIA WAR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $468k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEMORY & HENRY UNIVERSITY2× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +6%
- FOFRIENDS OF HOLLYWOOD CEMETERY2× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +54%
- SJST JOHN'S CHURCH FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2023 · $65k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- HCHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +59%
- TRTHE ROSEWELL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -90% · 27% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF THE JAMES RIVER PARKgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Tudor place historic house & garden preserves the stories of six generations of descendants of martha washington and the enslaved and free people who lived and worked at this georgetown landmark for nearly two centuries. by examining their…
Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.
The mission of the american civil war museum collection is to serve as the preeminent world center for the display, study, interpretation, commemoration, and preservation of the history and artifacts of the confederate states of america.
To preserve Virginias history and craft the most prosperous future for all of its citizens.
The schs mission is to expand, preserve, and make accessible our invaluable collection, and to encourage interest and pride in the rich history of our state.
The mission of the museum of the shenandoah valley (msv) is to preserve and enrich the cultural life and heritage of the shenandoah valley. serving the region as a cultural site, the msv fulfills its mission by presenting exhibitions;…
History is not the past; it is the story we tell about the past. every person in albemarle county and the city of charlottesville has a unique and powerful story to tell. through collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of our…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Richmond Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Southampton County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds EMORY & HENRY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE ROSEWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MENOKIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HOLLYWOOD CEMETERY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE JAMES RIVER PARK ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ELK HILL FARM INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S CHURCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LYRIC COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC RICHMOND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
- Who funds The Byrd Theatre Foundation ↗
- Who funds PETERSBURG AREA ART LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN REDISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S VILLA ↗
- Who funds Fairfield Foundation of Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AVENEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF VA ANTIQUITIES ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation · Tesco Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Windsor Fdn Trust Uw Quincy Cole · Chrisman Family Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · The Pauley Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Roller-Bottimore Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Roller-Bottimore Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Roller-Bottimore Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.