Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roe Green Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$5.8MEducation$4.5MHealth$1.7MPhilanthropy$166kReligion$108kScience & Tech$100kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $293k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $425k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.6M
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION)$2,835,304
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$500,875
BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS & DESIGN - JERUSALM$250,000
CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE$225,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALSCWRU$100,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALSUH$100,000
DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND$35,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION -SCHOOL OF THEATRE & DANCE$35,000
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE$30,000
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION)$25,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$25,000
CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$25,000
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE$25,000
SHAW FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $750k → 17%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION): $2.8M → 18%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $500k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $501k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION: $155k → 17%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $463k → 17%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION): $25k → 18%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $150k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $500k → 12%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $37k → 17%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $35k → 17%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION): $25k → 18%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $499k → 12%THEATRE FORWARD: $30k → 17%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION): $25k → 18%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $30k → 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $25k → 17%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $30k → 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $25k → 17%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $25k → 11%CLEVELAND BALLET: $37k → 17%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $25k → 11%CLEVELAND BALLET: $26k → 17%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $25k → 11%MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE: $25k → 11%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $400k → 17%DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND: $25k → 17%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $275k → 17%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $250k → 17%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $250k → 17%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $225k → 17%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $225k → 17%LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER: $50k → 11%CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $188k → 17%LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER: $50k → 11%CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $80k → 11%CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $75k → 11%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $300k → 17%CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $60k → 11%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $300k → 17%CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $300k → 17%CULTURAL COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $300k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $257k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALSUH: $100k → 17%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALSCWRU: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Roe Green Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 31% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 16%.

The Roe Green Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 19 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$12M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+37%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +2%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +79%
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • WI
    WOMENSAFE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +75%
  • TM
    The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritagegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
2
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
3
Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park

We are Cincinnati's national theater - committed to bringing diverse, engaging works of great artistry to our community, and to putting Cincinnati's artistic excellence in the national spotlight.

Arts & Culture
4
Cleveland Public Theatre Inc

To raise consciousness and nurture compassion through ground-breaking performances and life-changing educational programs

Arts & Culture
5
Playhouse Square Foundation

Playhouse Square Foundation is a not-for-profit performing arts center whose mission is presenting and producing a wide variety of quality performing arts, advancing arts education, and creating a theater district that is a superior…

Arts & Culture
6
Theaterworks Inc

Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…

Arts & Culture
7
Ballet Theatre Foundation Inc

To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…

Arts & Culture
8
The City Theatre Company Inc

To provide an artistic home for the development and production of contemporary plays that engage and challenge a diverse audience.

Arts & Culture
9
The Studio Theatre Inc

Studio Theatre produces exceptional contemporary theatre in deliberately intimate spaces, fostering a more thoughtful, more empathetic, and more connected community, in Washington DC and beyond.

Arts & Culture
10
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Ensemble Theatre

To produce theatre on the highest possible professional level. interest to jewish audiences.

—
12
Performing Arts Foundation of Kansas City

The theatre is a not-for-profit corporation organized and operated exclusively for the promotion of activities to encourage interest in and appreciation for the performing arts.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maltz Jupiter Theatre Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womensafe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION): $2,970,304 · OtherCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION (FOUNDATION)UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: $1,456,880 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSBEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS & DESIGN - JERUSALM: $750,000 · OtherBEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS & DESIGN - JERUSALMKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION -SCHOOL OF THEATRE & DANCE: $270,000 · Other+13 more: $485,750 · Other+13 moreTHE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC: $1,757,201 · Arts & CultureTHE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INCTHE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $1,457,767 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSEMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $910,000 · Arts & CultureMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INCCultural Council of Palm Beach County Inc: $420,000 · Arts & CultureCultural Council of Palm Beach County Inc+4 more: $89,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,509,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $61,174 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $164,953 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $75,000 · PhilanthropyLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $100,000 · Science & Tech
Other$5,932,934Arts & Culture$4,633,968Education$1,571,174Philanthropy$239,953Science & Tech$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC: $1,757,201 over 7y, 22% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,509,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $1,457,767 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $910,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetCultural Council of Palm Beach County Inc: $420,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $164,953 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND BALLET: $63,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $61,174 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATRE FORWARD INC: $36,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPIANO INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF NORTHERN OH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSICAL THEATER PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINLET DANCE THEATRE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DRAMATISTS GUILD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Cultural Council of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND BALLET ↗
  • Who funds KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE FORWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH DRAMAWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENSAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIANO INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF NORTHERN OH ↗
  • Who funds The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSICAL THEATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds INLET DANCE THEATRE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John P Murphy FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John P Murphy Foundation · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Kulas Foundation · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roe Green Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roe Green Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Roe Green Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Roe Green Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roe Green’s filings →

    More from the funding graph