Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$470kPublic Benefit$110kEducation$94kEnvironment$88kCivil Rights$51kCrime & Legal$43kArts & Culture$31kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $55k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$15,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$10,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND$10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$10,000
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$10,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$5,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$5,000
MARTHAS VINEYARD HOSPITAL$5,000
CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION$5,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$5,000
FARM NECK FOUNDATION$2,500
SHERIFFS MEADOW FOUNDATION$1,000
MARTHAS VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP$1,000
HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MV$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARTHAS VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%MARTHAS VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%MV COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%MARTHAS VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $3k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $1k → 8%HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MV: $1k → 8%HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF MV: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF MARTHAS VINEYARD: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$845k · 47 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
14

Total granted

$845k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+38%

Still filing today

66%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +40%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    2× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +432%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • VR
    VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +43%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • OA
    OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
25/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION: $55,000 · OtherALZHEIMER ASSOCIATIONENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE: $52,000 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSEMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $40,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY AC: $31,000 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $30,000 · OtherVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION+32 more: $127,400 · Other+32 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $65,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDAT…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $57,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $40,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL…THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AME…American Heart Association Inc: $16,000 · HealthCUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · Health+2 more: $2,500 · HealthTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $75,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER P…OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Civil RightsOUR AMERICA…WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · EducationWESLEYAN U…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $20,000 · EnvironmentSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EnvironmentHOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC DBA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF MARTHA'S: $12,500 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$365,400Health$303,000Civil Rights$95,000Education$91,000Crime & Legal$41,000Environment$27,000Human Services$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $57,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC DBA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF MARTHA'S: $12,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFARM NECK FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOWARD COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD FILM SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC DBA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF MARTHA'S ↗
  • Who funds FARM NECK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE MID-ATLANTIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD CEREBRAL PALSY CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richlin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richlin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Hospice of Martha's Vineyard Inc Dba Hospice and Palliative Care of Martha's: 5% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richlin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph