Skip to content
The Resnik Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Resnik Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$468k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$725kReligion$534kHealth$358kArts & Culture$318kHuman Services$201kInternational$199kCivil Rights$160kEnvironment$155kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $121k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $347k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$33,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$25,000
World Central Kitchen Inc$25,000
Hawaii Community Foundation$25,000
BRAVE NEW FILMS$25,000
WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL$18,000
LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION$15,000
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ASSISTANCE PROJECT$15,000
VALLEY BETH SHALOM$11,100
PUBLIC COUNSEL$10,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$10,000
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC$10,000
Center for Reproductive Rights Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $8k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $8k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $10k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $9k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $5k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $5k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $3k → 14%ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
AZ
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 45 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
9

Total granted

$3.0M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-1%

Still filing today

98%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WN
    WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $507k · revenue +117%
  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $173k · revenue +51%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $147k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -51%
  • MA
    Modeh Ani
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -85%
  • OF
    OSA Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
9
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
10
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Modeh Ani. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
38/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL: $507,300 · EducationWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $173,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANC…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY …JEWISH WORLD WATCH: $82,467 · EducationJEWISH WORLD WATCH+5 more: $79,100 · Education+5 moreVALLEY BETH SHALOM: $532,080 · OtherVALLEY BETH SHALOMBABY2BABY: $40,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $80,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 · OtherFeeding America: $51,500 · OtherWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $49,500 · OtherPUBLIC COUNSEL: $57,500 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+20 more: $253,300 · Other+20 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $146,500 · InternationalWORLD CEN…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $40,000 · InternationalThe Ameri…Save The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 · InternationalSave The …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN …ELEM YOUTH IN DISTRESS INC: $12,500 · InternationalModeh Ani: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,800 · InternationalLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $72,500 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $45,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $37,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ART RESOURCE CENTER: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $22,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17,500 · Arts & CultureTHE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $9,500 · Arts & CultureST JOSEPH CENTER: $47,500 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $40,000 · Human ServicesORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $33,500 · Human ServicesHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $15,000 · Human ServicesCANINE SUPPORT TEAMS INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $47,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $45,000 · HealthMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $42,500 · HealthSAN FERNANDO VALLEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $32,500 · HealthWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $15,000 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $130,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Environment
Education$981,867Other$1,173,880International$270,800Arts & Culture$254,500Human Services$191,000Health$182,500Environment$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL: $507,300 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $173,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $146,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $82,467 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $72,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $57,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $51,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $49,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $47,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $47,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART RESOURCE CENTER: $35,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY: $33,500 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 3y, 40% of budgetPS ARTS: $30,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAURENCE SCHOOL: $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MAUI INC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAHAINA RESTORATION FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetELEM YOUTH IN DISTRESS INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetInner City Law Center: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetModeh Ani: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOSA Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Annenberg Foundat…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Ralph M Parsons F…Liberty Hill Foundati…Weingart FoundationJewish Community Foun…Hyman Levine Family F…The Rose Hills Founda…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Community Fede…
California Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Hyman Levine Family Foundation L'Dor V'Dor · The Rose Hills Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Resnik Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Resnik Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Resnik Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home