Skip to content

· Public charity

The Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family Foundation

We exist to improve the lives of black and brown children in the southern sector of Dallas via economic stability, food security, and academic excellence.

$231k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$854kFood & Nutrition$483kYouth Development$407kHuman Services$30kHealth$30kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $222,175, the rows itemized in this filing. The $231,259 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,084 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
$15,103
Median grant
2
States reached
$311k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
North Texas Food Bank$95,737
Kroger$64,257
Girl Scouts of Netx$18,031
Mercy Street$15,103
Cowboys Golf Club$12,747
Network of Community Mini$10,300
Uplift Education$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Network of Community Mini: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 8 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $799k · revenue +57%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $349k · revenue +89%
  • CM
    CHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $241k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PF
    PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $37k · revenue -6%
  • BT
    Big Thought - Prtshp Donation
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • UI
    Upfrom Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
2
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
3
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
4
The Young People's Project Inc

The young people's project uses math literacy work to develop the abilities of elementary through high school students to succeed in school and in life.

Education
5
Building Bridges Education

Building Bridges Education (BBE) is a non-profit organization at the forefront of creating transformative, high-impact programming. BBE is committed to equity-driven initiatives that empower students to embark on journeys of…

Education
6
New Mexico Out-of School Time Network

To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…

Education
7
Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Metro Milwaukee

For nearly 50 years, bbbs has made a proven transformative impact on thousands of young people facing adversity in milwaukee and waukesha counties. through ongoing professional case management and mentorship from dedicated trained…

—
8
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
9
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
10
North Texas Lead

North texas lead creates a bridge between company partners and qualified job-seekers. we build a growing community of leaders by connecting top talent with top employers. north texas lead works with employers and community leaders…

Civil Rights
11
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
12
YouthBuild Newark Inc

To harness the intelligence and positive energy of low-income young people to rebuild their community and their lives.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Northeast Texas; the most unlike its peers is Pepsico Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UPLIFT EDUCATION: $798,844 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATIONNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $349,370 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKKroger: $96,769 · OtherKrogerPEPSICO FOUNDATION INC: $36,594 · OtherPEPSICO FOUNDATION INCBig Thought - Prtshp Donation: $30,000 · OtherUpfrom Inc: $22,800 · Other+3 more: $32,936 · Other+3 moreCHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION: $240,784 · Youth DevelopmentCHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDAT…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $83,936 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEA…MERCY STREET: $38,735 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY STREETBIG THOUGHT: $55,000 · Arts & CultureLEAD PROGRAM IN BUSINESS: $44,030 · Community ImprovementHIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC: $20,000 · ReligionNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $10,300 · Human Services
Education$798,844Other$568,469Youth Development$363,455Arts & Culture$55,000Community Improvement$44,030Religion$20,000Human Services$10,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $798,844 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $349,370 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION: $240,784 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $83,936 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEAD PROGRAM IN BUSINESS: $44,030 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMERCY STREET: $38,735 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPEPSICO FOUNDATION INC: $36,594 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $10,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHOCOLATE MINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds LEAD PROGRAM IN BUSINESS ↗
  • Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
  • Who funds PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rees-Jones FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Randolph W & Dr Lael C Melville Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph