Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Piemonte Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$307kHuman Services$125kEducation$20kReligion$15kRecreation & Sports$6kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k50 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$300
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of Dentistry$50,000
Assistance League of Santa Ana$5,000
USC$3,000
USC Caruso Catholic Center$2,500
Assistance League of Long Beach$2,000
Hoag Hospital Foundation$1,400
Individual grant recipient$1,000
The ALS Association of Greater San Diego$1,000
The Nature Conservacy$1,000
Loyola High School$700
ALD Connect$600
Homeboy Industries$600
Little Red Dog$500
UCSF$500
Catalina Island Conservancy$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $125 → 9%Ainsley's Angels of America: $104 → 10%Hillsides: $200 → 14%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $600 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $500 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $300 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $200 → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $100 → 11%Freedom Dogs: $350 → 11%St Joseph Center: $100 → 14%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $10k → 10%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $5k → 10%Freedom Dogs: $125 → 11%Assistance League of Santa Ana: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
SC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$514k · 46 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
33

Total granted

$514k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+35%

Still filing today

39%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    Assistance League of Long Beach
    7× · 2018–2024 · $104k · revenue +11%
  • AL
    Assistance League of Santa Ana
    3× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +98%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +300%

Funded once

  • ME
    Marengo Elementary School
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • TS
    The Sailing Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • TL
    The Loyola Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Altadena Mountain Rescue Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily FoundationsAnimal Rescue and AdvocacyDiverse Social Impact Funde…Medical Research and Health…Professional & Trade Associ…Affordable Housing and Supp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%5%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr13%75%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/51
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,927

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
28/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

USC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of Dentistry — $267,250 · OtherUSC - Orthodontic Department of the Ostrow School of DentistryAssistance League of Long Beach — $104,000 · OtherAssistance League of Long BeachIndividual grant recipient — $18,000 · Other+71 more — $77,973 · Other+71 moreHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,800 · HealthCUREBOUND — $6,644 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC — $2,500 · HealthSONG FOR CHARLIE INC — $2,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,125 · Health+5 more — $1,600 · HealthAssistance League of Santa Ana — $20,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $1,700 · Human Services+5 more — $1,004 · Human ServicesPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,350 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $1,100 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $250 · EducationHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $1,100 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $650 · Youth DevelopmentEmpowered Girls Inc — $250 · Youth DevelopmentHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $750 · PhilanthropyTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $710 · PhilanthropyLittle Red Dog Inc — $1,250 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $150 · AnimalsBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $50 · Animals
Other$467,223Health$33,669Human Services$22,704Education$2,700Youth Development$2,000Philanthropy$1,460Animals$1,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAssistance League of Long Beach — $104,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAssistance League of Santa Ana — $20,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND — $6,644 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSONG FOR CHARLIE INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Red Dog Inc — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,125 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION — $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS — $1,099 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALD CONNECT INC — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM DOGS — $475 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLIAM WARDRIP FOUNDATION — $325 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmpowered Girls Inc — $250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON ATHLETIC FUND ATHLETIC FUND — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDES — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Center — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA SCORES LA — $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach
  • Who funds Assistance League of Santa Ana
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CUREBOUND
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds SONG FOR CHARLIE INC
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
  • Who funds Little Red Dog Inc
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SHIPBOARD EDUCATION
  • Who funds BEYOND BLINDNESS
  • Who funds KOKUA HAWAII FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Confidence Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Piemonte Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph